I think he meant tri e te.

Was he not into angling for a brief period.

the bigesst failing is the no hope managment ...
good idea to be relegated on sky tv.
mmmm
what do we need to get behind the club?
Hope. ambition .plans.actions.comunication.
who would dare to do that?
put their heads above the papripit
oooooo we found one .already put his money where his mouth is .
the saviour we had have looked for 60 years.

we bicker snipe lie invent opinions based on inuendo and falshoods.
lets pretend we are all matt Ellis.
mmmmm taking over 5m of debt
mmmm religated
mmmm stand not ready
mmmm do i want to be Walker Richardson glover Carter or Minard.(all vilified for trying )
can invest in rugby league clubs with more fans less problems with half of. monies needed to turn trin around

No made my bed i want wakefield trinity.
please dont stop this imminent event
just joint the journey be happy enjoy the ride to succesd

You can try and make your point once or twice then it becomes boring to others. Think I am wise enough to stop beating the same drum repeatedly.

he sounds like someone I used to no foggy, or chissett or happy jack or tag a long or
Little brain or whatever he calls himself these days

Not a clue what your on about mopsey. This is first time I have contributed to this site in any capacity. I am not bored of all the discussions just the one where I was repeating myself so had sense to stop that line.
Anyway just read the full jm interview and I am even more convinced he should stay on as middle man. He has too much knowledge re img process that will be Invaluable over next year or so.

Not sure I understand the sheer bromance with JM though. It's quite full on. Hope it works out for you.

I have cracked it, Trin e ti is John Minnards Former Secretory

Really scraping the barrel there mate.

No bromine never met the nan orobably never will. I am just looking at it from a club / business sense. Last company I worked for was bought by a big company and old md offered to stay on for a year and all was going well until new owners thought they new it all after a couple of months and told him to bugger off. Problem was he knew everything suppliers , agents etc and that was all lost and consequently new firm lasted 2 years. Knowledge is power as they say and to me he would be the glue. Sorry I have a different take on the club and am not bitter and hold vendetta against individuals like some. There are 2 sides to every story and this mine , others may agree or may not but I hope I do try and look forward with a positive mind set.

Let's not do this. Trying to 'out' someone always goes wrong. Some on here should know better.

Trin e ti is not alone in thinking Minards is good for the club. I base it on the same logic he does having gone through plenty of takeovers and it is logical to keep knowledge in house, at least for the transition.
If Ellis has someone else in mind it isn't a problem, just a slower start.

What I don't get is people who have no idea who Ellis would put in place are so confident everything will be better.
That 'better' life remains to be seen.

Regardless of whether you like Minards or blame him for the team (which isn't him), he was brought in to get the stadium done and he has done something no one else has been able to do in getting the stadium development off the ground. That project isn't finished. If it isn't Minards, the new person needs to be top notch

You forgot to mention mopseyslovechild squire


Not much changes .........edit by Poptart.......



Consider this a warning. You can't say that Chissett.
Speaking as a mod this time.

I can say what I like to who I like and when I like if it suits thank you, I don't need your permission to defend myself against mischief makers like him, perhaps if you concerned yourself with that along with the insults and untruths aimed against the directors and management and also against genuine trinity fans on here you'd go somewhere to restoring harmony lost on here through the likes of him, he makes wrongful accusations against me and when I reply with a few home truths it's me in the wrong, couldn't make it up could you, no apologies on my part you do what your comfortable with, just don't try patronising me, it's your bat and ball do what you want, btw it's chissitt

if you'd like to apologise on this occasion il accept it. X

Not my rules Chissitt. Everybody has to follow the AUP.
I've applied a temporary ban and will discuss with other mods.

Keep your eye out for a few of his other names he uses to abuse and ridicule people, Happy jack, little Wayne, chissitt, mopseys love child, trin e ty. No idea why he does this must be an ego trip, I won't say no more he seems like he needs help so it's not the time.

Why bring me into this ??

Knowledge is power, but at the same time, you wouldnt blame him, if Ellis wanted a total clean slate, if the takeover continues to progress, without any problems further down the line.

Its not unknown for businesses to have a consultant onside, without them neccesarily being on the BOD or payroll

I wouldn't blame anyone who is trying to take club forward. They may well have the personal to do this without jm input only they know. If they have all well and good if not then foolish not to utilise his knowledge.

You talk about his knowledge but where has his knowledge got us?

Since Minnards joined the product on the field has got worse every season, that is not me spouting rubbish as some people would say, that is a fact.

People say he is on top of the IMG stuff but I would hazard a guess that by reading the document which is readily available online anybody from here would have the same knowledge on it.

Really?
Why don't you give it a bash then and enlighten all the rest of us on here.......

Which bit of what I have said is incorrect?

Tell me what you would like enlightening on and I will happily do that for you

Knowledge of the stand development and the various stadium projects. That was his primary focus and his success where many (every) others have failed.

He isn't the running the team guy

Having knowledge of IMG criteria by reading it clearly isn't something most on here have at all. That has been proved daily.
But what he has is experience talking to IMG and RFL about the criteria, what it means to us and how we can best improve our score efficiently.
We still have people saying we need to improve West Side because it doesn't look nice......which gets us nothing. And complaining that we bought a screen and floodlights instead of buying an extra player, which got us considerably more points........
It's the difference between someone who supports the club from the terrace and someone who understands the details of running a Super League club.

Yes the screen earns you IMG brownie points but the floodlights earn you nothing. People are confused when the LED lights are mentioned it's not the actual floodlights but those boards you see around the pitch with advertising on.
Plus the IMG stipulate quite a bit about dimensions and positioning of press boxes and broadcast studio with minimum dimensions and positioning . We are using that dump on West Terrace for this purpose and I suspect it's far from suitable for scoring points in that area.

Finally IMG stipulate all sponsors boxes must be on or near the half way line, so as far as I can see things that rules out any points we may get for the flats.

In summary, we are much stronger than Cas in many areas but still quite a bit to do to get all brownie points on offer.

You are
correct regarding the LED boards. Cas won't be able to have them as there isn't enough room between touchline and railings and they are quite deep boxes close up.