I think it is required if it's classified as a new development - if it's a re-development then possibly not.

If you are worried about parking I believe two sites owned by the council had been identified

Just because you don't see it doesn't mean it isn't there. However you're right in the sense that it's pretty much irrelevant because it won't get built because it was never meant to be built.

Well of course they have just like they identified Thornes College which they didn't own and NM which didn't happen. Forgive me if I'm less than impressed.

Also why not build the stadium on this land earmarked for parking - just an idea.

You are not the only one with friends of friends plus I believe the planning threshold for temporary car parking is less than a stadium especially where there isn’t one at the moment.
I am sure you will come up with another avenue of objection based on an artist’s impression. What about the Wakefield logo which is clearly too big for the area it is located

Nice try, yep I'm the bad guy on this subject and you're the hero - can't see many buying into you being a hero - me as the bad guy, probably.

Big enough to accommodate Trinity? In locations in Wakefield, or the Wakefield District?

Ask the club they know the areas allocated for parking.
I think Vastman is a manipulator who has sadly alienated a lot of supporters who no longer post leaving just a few of his entourage who agree with his many questionable assumptions.
He now supports our relocation away from that nasty council because that is more important than the possibility that the club could lose its SL status
Don’t bother reverting to type by trying to insult me because I really don’t care there is more to worry about in this conservative controlled country than what you think

Newmarket?

Sorry but I have no idea where you are referring too- areas allocated for parking???

Funny because someone in the club knew apparently. They must be keeping secrets from you. I will say I believe one of the areas proposed is partly owned by the council and partly by a third party.
Whilst you are on any idea where we will be playing next season.

That reads like "Carter, you know nothing, people in the club know more than you, they don't want you to know, you are a mug. I am prepared to make up the rumour that some land earmarked for parking is owned by WMDC and a 3rd party (though surely they would be a 2nd party, in a 2 party ownership). Oh, and by the way, where are we playing next season mate?".

What is most interesting about your recent posts is that they are constructed in a way to create confusion and division amongst those who are debating the issue. akin to the political style favoured by public figures ... divide and conquer... isolate and discredit the leader... confuse the main issue with a plethora of irrelevant but,very loud, side issues!

I am unable to deduce a motive in your posts that cannot be described as nefarious! Subversive at best!

The only way we can come through this is stick to the game pllan... don't buy any dummies and stay focussed

I believe the statement to the third party was while they were buying there season ticket in the club shop. The sales person concerned did not know the person they were talking to actually owns the said land.

Have you bought yours yet John are are you sticking to your statement

And all you need to know is right there in the first sentence ‘apparently’ !

I have tremendous admiration for MC but I wish he would stop posting on here. It does not not help to get in to arguments with nobodies like scarlet. MC should be above that. Leave the rest of us to defend the club.

I used to be of the belief that MC would be better not posting on here but have changed my mind.
I doubt, in the whole or RL, if there is a club owner more close to the fans than MC. He's worked wanders at our club (others included!) and he seems to appreciate the interaction with the supporters.
therefore, whilst posting on here, it would probably be humanly impossible not to respond to some of the silly comments on here.

With the greatest respect how can you defend an untruth, because you wouldn’t know if it was or it wasn’t?

I used to think that. However his replies are very specific and fairly short and very informative. I think he's allowed that indulgence.

Although your spot on you've expressed yourself so well you've managed to make him sound smarter than he is.

His attempts are so lame and transparent its just plain sad. Especially Tharg? his latest incarnation (I suspect).

No idea what his real beef is but he's obsessive about it.

Agree. Tbh I bet MC reads loads of stuff on here that he would love to vent at & put people straight on, because I know I would in his position. Especially when people are just blatantly making crap up and talking the Club down for no good reason, but he probably realises it's not worth it in his position.

Not only MC Shifty

You're probably right and I don't normally seek out conspiracy theories... except the moon landing.... aliens ... and possibly Bigfoot!


Just seems that some of his posts are ... well... completely rhubarb!!!

Your not the only one thinking that Spook.