From a neutral point of view if its a choice of ground sharing or losing your super league status (which you will do if you dont deliver on the promises the club has made) then surely its a no brainer ?????

This thread is a bit silly but it does have merit, if only to get Gronk spluttering out more of his awesome FACTS!

Personally I wouldn't mind sharing, on the proviso that following each Cas game, some kind of antibacterial wipe was provided at each seat, just to be on the safe side.

Heaven forbid I may have made something up, it's a hypothetical scenario for gods sake!!!! Unlike you with your facts, you still owe me £25 quid by the way!!!!
Why play in Doncaster when you can play at NM, would less people go to NM than trail to Doncaster, just to save face? (hypothetically, of course!!!)

It's the same no brainer as it was when the idea was first mooted a couple of seasons ago. Just a shame it took so long for the penny to drop.

And I suspect that the owners will be delighted with the revenue that another tenant will bring in. Any bets on it being called simply Newmarket, with nary a mention in the title of either Wakey or Cas?

As far as I'm aware "Newmarket" is the project name, the stadium naming rights will be sold off once building has started, if there's not already an existing agreement in place between Yorkcourt (the developers) and another company.

I would go as far as to say I'm almost 99% sure the stadium name WON'T contain the words "Trinity" or "Wildcats", it's not ours for one and there's the revenue we can raise from the naming, so as I said I doubt it will be in keeping with our clubs name/ any of our nicknames.

Personally I couldn't care less, I'm just dying for them to get the PI done and start building.

As a Sandal resident I've become accustomed living close to the ground. Might have to look at a move to Bottomboat/Stanley, ruffle a few feathers with the locals!

It's not a bold statement, it's a hypothetical statement based on an outcome that is possible.
And based on the structure of the question, it's aimed at Wakefield fans in order to ascertain the level of support for a groundshare at NM. You will get your chance when I put a cas version of the same question on your site.
I'm quite surprised it's 42-5 in favour so far from us.

If that were the case then surely it would make more sense to get a cleansing company to sponsor the naming rights, it would cost a fortune to detox the stadium every other week. Walker won't be happy if his trusts budget is spent on sanitising.

The Cillit BANG Stadium- every other week just wipe and the scum is gone!

We should all hope that both clubs get their wishes. I can confirm that wmdc are trying to assist both clubs in getting their holy Grails, but time is running out for both clubs and real progress needs to happen - fast!

I think it would be safe to assume that the stadium will be named along the lines of the McAlpine/Galpharm/K.C./Stobart/Haliwell Jones/DW stadiums.

Congratulations William for yesterday, I look forward to burrow and Ali pulling on the R,W & B next season


The difference is that with the franchise announcement, there is a real hanging threat for both us or cas to deliver on the ground front.
The question I asked is obviously from a successful NM outcome point of view.

The WCT stadium?

I'm almost certain, from an excellent source, that a large sponsor is already in place to take up the naming rights option.

He is a pointless poster unfortunatly. Isnt it better we get our own house in order before thinking about those little town neighbours.

Ever heard of the word ..............................






















































































































[size=200
HYPOCRITE?[/size

Ah, so plan B and the mega money revamp at BV has fell at the first hurdle then. Was B and Q closed? I thought the master plan was to turn BV into something rivaling the 7 Wonders on £500k was a tad ambitious. Would it help if I had a root through the garage as I know there's loads of unfinished tins of paint in there somewhere?

We've given you Ali and Amor, and that's yer lot, as Ali is guaranteed to be your Player of the Year next season. Robbie will be remaining at here, and will most likely be stuffed and mounted in a glass case in the new North Stand when he eventually pops his diminutive clogs.

Whilst Charity is good for the soul, there is a finite limit on the amount of largesse that even Yorkshire's Premiere Club, and 2011 Champions can dispense to its needy neighbours!

Wot's up Billy....?????.....Getting worried we're pinching some of your best players......?????

Now what's the phrase....something to do with the words.....KETTLE - POT - and BLACK...I think







The tide has turned pal, and we are coming for you...

Knob

Is this character for real !!! What an idiot, go spout your crap to someone that cares, your fellow seacroft stinkbombs are right behind you.

You've lost me?

Were you ever dropped on your head in infancy?

Only 13% against, i am surprised.

i strongly believe that we have to stick together Wakefield and Cas, when you think the climate where in at the moment, i feel that we need as strong a case as possible to put through to revie, lets put bickering aside. i have been fully supportive of having a shared stadium with the rivals, boo hoo, so we wont have a place to call our own, get real. Cant see a real problem or justified argument to not share with Cas, for at least its a 50:50 stake each, we will hopefully have a stadium at half the cost/running costs. Could you imagine the derby, be great. by the way billy rhino is a cock, some people are sore winners.

As I posted on your thread on the Cas board

It would be interesting if you try the same poll questions on both boards with the opposite scenario -

"Castleford are on with GH and NM isn't looking like happening"

See what results we get then

I think because the scenario would be different (cas and wakey being joint tenants at NM as apposed to wakey being cas' tenants at their GH) it would skew the results.
The subtle difference would make it a different proposition IMO.
If you would find it interesting, then by all means run a poll from your perspective, i would be more than happy to add my views (again!!!

)