I think it was an attempted TRIP, but yes I guess ATTEMPTED is the relevant word there. Followed by several other decisions that year that saw players warned but not banned for ACTUAL trips.

No idea.

three hundred quid and they let him keep his awesome brilliant credible desirable.............. games played thing going.

Stinks but we've become accustomed to such

why's that funny?

Everything you type is funny.

Thanks very much

Ryan McGoldrick up before the disciplnary for kicking out in the tackle and catching Sam Tomkins whilst playing against Wigan with no injury to Tomkins.

Guess what?

1 match ban and a £300 fine.

I despair!

I can not catch my breth

jezz don't they show them selves up

Proves what we all say, it depends who you play for.

Unbloodybelievable - what a joke.

Beyond a bloody joke

It seems unfair but (playing devils advocate here ...) they will take into consideration previous history and if McGoldrick has been up before them previously that may have been taken into consideration?

Not saying it has, just that it might have?

Probably but do we need players to do the same incident a few times before it becomes punishable!!
That means Senior as another kick left him yet!!!
Personally I think it should be 10 mins! If its then deemed malicious the player can be called up and banned!!

The ! suggest surprise.

Going off at a tangent, I was pursing the organic tomatoes in t'ASDA at Cas when M'Goldrick wandered right in front of my trolley. I could have accidentally taken him out for two or three matches but then I thought 'Why do Cas a favour?'

senior kicks a 6ft 3 player in the face who had regained his feet and split his eye, no ban. lee smith kicks phil bailey in the face again after bailey had regained his feet in the final eliminator, no ban ( and went on to get man of the match in the final). if a player is thrashing about on the floor and someone catches a stray boot cos they layed on then that is accidental. when a player vertically kicks his legs out common sense tells you there is a chance someone is gonna get caught. reckless and dangerous. but mcgoldrick gets banned. set of f**king idiots at redhall. no balls, no consistency, no idea !!!!

You forgot to mention Sam Tomkins from last year - found guilty and fined,but no ban.

Good man, no point helping them out.

i cannot recall the incident, so cannot say how bad it was or whether the other player had regained his feet,had injury caused etc, but if this was the case should sam have been banned....absolutely. which is why i was bemoaning the lack of consistency

Won't be long before a players seriously damaged by a stray boot. What message are the RFL sending out Junior players



Redhall needs knocking down with the buffoooooooooooooooooooooons still inside it.

Appealed and lost, further £200 costs. Thats from the Cas board.

He's a dick but its not fair IMO.

who Richard

Personally think whether injury is caused is irrelevant.Injuries can be caused in perfectly legal tackles.
If its reckless/dangerous - ban them.

but whether injury is caused should be an aggravating factor and add to the punishment. for me a least a 2 game ban should be in force with additional games for any aggravating circumstances. but this will never happen as redhall are spineless and inconsistent and make decisions on the importance of games, eg lee smith in the final eliminater on phil bailey.