He was named in the 19 to play against Salford, but we probably did this just to build his hopes up, so that we could cruelly dash them at the 11th hour... cos we're really sneaky like that, as of course you already know.

ponner

Ooh, do you now?





Did brough tell you himself?

bet you he didn't !

LOL if you only knew




Roger's a good friend.

Could possibly end up being a good move for us in a similar way to when Solomona left.. It's always sad to see your better players leave but when Solomona left it kind of galvanised the squad and brought them tighter together.

I could see this going the same way if I'm honest.. Obviously Brough is a top quality player and one you would certainly want in your side for his ability, what we lose in his ability though maybe made up in team spirit and togetherness with his departure.

I've no axe to grind with Brough at all or the club.

It's more of a business than a sport nowadays and for a player it's a short career, I don't blame any player for going somewhere for a greater salary if given the opportunity. Broughy has been a cracking player for us and despite the odd brain explosions here and there he's done a lot more good than bad and always played with a passion and a desire to win.

The club have seemingly done all they can to keep hold of him, but if another club is in a position to offer him more, then I don't see what more we can do.

Despite the dislike by some on here Huddersfield are a cracking side on the up and on the verge of challenging for honours (slightly ahead of us at the moment

) and Broughy if he does go there will be a great addition for them.

I would certainly like to thank him for his efforts for us and wish him well in his new challenge...

Ahh that's it, a family member with no hint of bias at all?!
Not wanting to paint a shining picture of the perfect individual then?!

"Oh he really wants to play this weekend, although he missed a training session, he loves wakey so much he'd but his body on the line for a cause he's leaving the next day."



Your entitled to your rumour's and views.

I have no problem with brough and wish him and huddersfield all the best and ill certainly be down to back you lot for everything come the announcement, as i've seen alot of your games this year..

Thanks from me Danny. know it doesn't count for much, but we have had a top super league scrum half for two years, and i know some will say trouble causer and other things that im not privvy to. but on the field he was good even class at times, he played well, and we will do well to replace him.

we move on and time will tell, lets hope we get someone to organise the side because as i feel at the moment Paul Cooke would have been a superb addition had we still had Danny and the best not mentioned hooker.

so we have cover for hooker but do we have cover for scrum half....

i dont want to be one of those he was great while he was here but now hes a T**T sort of fans, Good luck Danny and lets hope hudds are 10/1+ for the CC.

16/1 with fred done. (betfred)

he ruled himsself out good ridence

Yeah right, but lets blame Ted - hell it couldn't be Danny he's always been a beacon of common sense and professionalism hasn't he



I suggest we all move on, no need to take sides as JK says these things happen.

Come on guys n gals brough was never gonna play if he got injured then all the negotiation means nothing if he of had a bad game and contributed to a loss we would off cried foul.

danny's gone, long live obst

When things like this happen there always four versions as to what happened. In this case there is Danny Brough's version, Wakefield's version, Huddersfield's version and there is the truth. People have quoted what they have been told or have heard, but unless they have been party to the whole process they cannot quote what they know as gospel. As it goes Brough will soon be another clubs problem, so let's just move on.

=#FF0000ONE AND ONLY WARNING , THIS BOARD CAN NOT SUSTAIN ALLEGATIONS OF THAT MAGNITUDE .


MUTLEY CAT

Ah well - he's gone now. Played very well for us most of the time, got the feeling he wasn't the easiest charicture to manage and possibly had a negative effect on those around him more than you would like. That said, it was probably that side of him that made him the player he was for us - take away that take away his edge maybe.

He's followed the money in a short career, you can't blame him for that - but as somebody mentioned earlier he appears to have shown a distinct lack of class in the whole saga. We've lost better than him in the past and will lose better than him in the future and we will get over it.

has he gone then officially?

no,heard on radio that the problem is thst we cant agree tearms with kirmond

I am not sure about this LOANING of a Hudds player. I'd prefer money or a perm deal if possible.

We're trying to build our own team, not get another teams player fit and full of confidence - For example Dave Halley.

I know somebody within the Giants and they asured me Kirmond is still in Nathan Browns plans for the future,Weird if so as he signed a new 4 year deal not so long ago.

Again as somebody else said I have heard the player mentioned was Greg McNally?

Also heard along the grapevine that nots all straight forward with why Mr.Brough is out of favour at the minute and its nothing to do with rugby.

Too true.

catalans ?

I can't be the only one who is fed up to the back teeth with this saga.
Danny has gone/is going/wants out/we want him out (delete the inapproriate points).
He did a good job for us and I hope he will do the same wherever and whenever he goes (with 2 obvious exceptions each season).
We move on and while we have JK we will undoubtably move upwards.

Who's arm is grabbing the pint?!

Not sure it's Drews pint he is grabbing

I'll have a shilling on it that old Slugger took the pic. I wouldnt mind betting Broughy was holding the table so the beer wouldnt spill because he knew Atkins was about to snot old sideshow Bob