Considering we have had 2 x screen size requirements in 12 months I do hope there’s been a guarantee that it won’t be increased further. That would be a kick in the private parts for clubs splashing out a few hundred k.

It’s amazing they can change that? Has there been any clubs purchase based on the old criteria? If so you’d be rightly aggrieved.

Luckily we will have a new one and some flashy LED boards. Looking forward to seeing the LED boards and if we are in SL next season it will open up more sponsorship and advertising revenue being on tv a lot more.

You couldn’t build a stand like ours without a lift, no matter how cheap a bodge you did, you wouldn’t get it passed as it’s against the law.

The reason the boxes got away with it is because they are deemed a temporary structure and didn’t need to meet the full criteria.

Something has now happened with the boxes imo but not sure want. Originally they only had a ten year lifespan before they would requiring removing or rebuilding. I can only assume that through the years they have been continually upgraded to meet criteria. It could be that the addition of a lift allows them to be reclassified as permanent.

This is quite important as it sets the template for what we can build at the south end of the ground if it is now a permanent structure. Considering its height, that would be almost anything.
Pretty shrewd for the cost of a lift but I might be wrong.

Must say the flats looks so much better with the recent paint job

Those flats are probably the best business decision and investment and Ted ever made.

It was Pearman not Ted who purchased them, but sadly never paid for them. We were lucky in that we got them by default. I think we paid about 10% of the cost back via the CVA.

Weren't they supposed to be going to Silverstone but the removal and transport costs made the deal financially unviable?

Don’t know tbh. I think in the end we paid what the CVA required and then Ted weighed in with a bit extra. Whatever, we didn’t pay what we should have, and as the poster said, it turned out to be one hell of a deal for us.

It’s been great over the years but I can’t help but think if the flats weren’t there then what could have been done with the money from developer etc.

It is great but in another way it’s a hindrance to futther development.

I can’t help but think it could be an ideal area for a basic stand much like that at York with a half open underside area to walk through.

In a way because it’s there we are forced to further develop the west/north. The space on south stand is considerable.

Hypothetical ofcourse and I am thankful we have a solid structure there that’s unique and has character.

Even after all these years I still find the flats an eyesore. But I think they'll bring in more income than a stand would based on crowds in recent years. That may change if we can start selling out over the coming seasons.

They look great on the inside now though. A lot of time, money and effort has gone into sprucing them up and ultimately are still a 365 days a year revenue earner for the club.

It would be nice when we get to a point where we are busting capacity so often that serious consideration needs to be made to replacing them, but until then there is no point going to the expense of the development of a stand that is only going to decrease our utilisation score for the short term. A simple terrace along the bottom would do for now, and I'm sure I read that is in the pipeline.

That so called eyesore brought in much needed revenue over the years.

I’m told Ellis is bringing the seats back from last year. The logic being that the refurbishment of the Fox bar and the old clubhouse will make them viable.

JM wanted to keep them but MC was against it. He had a point as he wanted to fill the new East stand, and at the time that looked difficult even if we had stayed up.

I think that if we hit SL next year we will probably be at 80% capacity on the east stand for most games. Meaning that you could easily allow 500 extra seat in front of the boxes without affecting the east stand.

Would look better, give people a choice, add some modest capacity and all for very little outlay, win win. Also a four sided ground always pleases people.

I don’t even think it is an eyesore, not when full. It just looked a bit tatty, especially at the base.

Not my description, when the bar was open without having to pay to get in the view from the balcony was excellent.

I know I was agreeing with you. The views are outstanding and the facilities are more than adequate imo.

I also think that with the new stand and the hopeful upgrade of the old clubhouse it will look quite integrated, especially if they follow the dark grey scheme.

This would mean that by next season only the west terrace will be bellow standard. Not bad considering where we were only a few years ago.

Before the flats were constructed the only hospitality we had was over the road at the Stoneleigh Hotel. They were a massive upgrade for us at the time and have been a money maker ever since.

I and a few hundred fans sat on those,seats,for almost 2 seasons when work started on demolition and rebuilding of East Stand, not a bad experience until it rains, sitting on wet seats and getting drenched is not fun, and I wouldn’t do it again,

In principle the temp seats were good, but they will only be overflow from main stand.
I can't see anyone choosing them first.

At a forum he mentioned terracing not seating be interesting to see how it pans out

I was going to say it would be better to have basic standing terracing instead of seating there.

Wasn’t their initial some plans to link it to the first floor of the flats?

You could add 500 or so standing and access into the bar area for refreshments.

That extra 500 or so would be full come the matches against Leeds, Cas and maybe the odd other.

Problem is that seating is far cheaper than seats, I know it sounds odd but it’s true and significantly so. You can do temp seating, not sure you can terracing, but might be wrong.

If it’s far cheaper then that’s fair enough. It would make sense.

Seating is cheaper than seats?

You've lost me.

I guess he means to make that flat piece of concrete in to terrace requires a lot of building up, so reasonably skilled labour and a lot of materials.
Temporary seating is bought as is and plonked on the floor with no alterations

Lost myself, I meant temp seating is cheaper than terracing.