Again, don't be too hard on Barton Willmore per say, they are just doing the job they are being paid to do by an objector. Even murderers get a barrister... if you get my point!

That said, I am fairly certain that as Andrew is 'questioning' them, and indeed they are expert hired guns, that he will not go easy on them... and I expect the inspector will let him!

Amber traffic lights mean "not ready"

Thanks IA. I'll be there at 10.00 if I can. I'd like to see what is going on.

After hearing today's news on LCC can they really afford to be in a costly wrangle with us over this. I know they have duty to their public but surely in economic time like this and today's announcement They ought to do the right thing financially and prioritise other spending areas before this.

And even more ironically, they have to make more cuts but he is still willing to spend Leeds Councils money fighting something that quite frankly should be none of his damn business.

Either that or todays announcement is a big shock and he may have rethink on opposing to save money/jobs

Seems not to mean that where I live, I must mean " put your foot down" :/

A real below the belt stunt by the Cas chairman; he is like another Ted Richardson but just in the black and yellow corner. Surely the Leeds barristers defense cannot hold up a argument about a invisible ground in glasshoughton this should just be dissmissed how can we talk about a ground that isn't even there? Quite baffling and it just shows the lack of argument the defense has ; its pathetic.

How Ironic KEith Wakefield was on look north yesterday talking about job cuts!

Why not contact the tory office for Leeds and get them to confront mr Wakefield about wasting tax payers money on this and ask him why is he stopping 2000 jobs in Wakefield after all people from Leeds may apply for these jobs too..??

That would be the same Ted Richardson who found the site, got Yorkcourt and the Council on board is it. It's sickening enough to hear no nothing clots like you destroy a mans reputations for the mistakes he did make. It's way beyond the pale to attack him for the one thing it is universally accepted by any fair minded and knowledgeable fan that he got right - Newmarket = Ted Richardson like it or not.

For all his faults I think I prefer Richard Wright to know nothing gob offs like you.

[size=200You are back to defend your lover [/size . Your blind love for Ted you cant see the real argument here you are pathetic !

What made you judge jury and executioner?

Ted struggled with this club for years in very trying conditions. Sure, he got many things wrong and I disagreed with him often, but most of us who went to his meetings came away pacified each time.

Love him or hate him, he did put this together, and if this is the only thing he got right (which it certainly isn't), then it is enough that we should at least offer some gratitude for. No Ted = No Newmarket!

You are the only blind fool around here.

Ted was responsible for alot of things that were bad at this club but he was also responsible for the chance that we might have a future.

You accuse Vasty of bias but can't see that you are worse. Most of us can see both sides, the positives and the negatives. You refuse to accept that there were some good things done.

Thursday must be day release.

I dont believe it Ted couldnt put a box of lego together !

Im certainly no Ted lover.

However, without his "tenacity" Wakefield would never have been allowed in Super League in the first place.

If Ted sorted out NM good on him, I have seen no proof to prove or disprove it, but i am minded to believe he did.
Its a shame he was so disastrous in other areas, and he will not get the chance to bask in his glory (other than personal reflection), but thats been done to death.
NGB4C is a clot and by answering his ramblings you are only fueling his madness, ignore him and he will disappear or enter the real world.
The ONLY thing that matters and that even includes the RW debate to an extent is for us all to remain together and hope for a good result at the end of this.
Let them that can, sort it out, and use what ammunition has been launched at us, to our benefit and those with all the facts and skills to convince the PI that NM is our future.
At this moment in time NOTHING else matters, including idiots like NGB4C and RW et al.

Am another on the side of Ted in this one. He was the driving force behind Newmarket .

Its a shame we even have to bring Ted's name up now but ironically NGB4C seems to have focussed us back on the good things he did.
Unfortunately for him he will be remembered for the collapse at the end of his tenure but he clearly did good things before then.

However it turned out for him, I do know he wanted the best for Wakefield Trinity. He has paid the price for his mistake by losing his job and a lot of credibility. Lets leave it there. We are now in a new age, why look back?

Ted Richardson had his faults and I had many a disagreement with him but on the Newmarket issue I can categorically confirm that it was Ted who found Newmarket and YorkCourt.

I know that because it was myself who unknowingly put him on to Newmarket. I happen to have a bit of knowlege about old colfield sites in Yorkshire and after Thornes Park collapsed Ted was speaking to me about possible old coalfield sites. I told him there were none available for development but mentioned the former Newmarket Silkstone Colliery site at Stanley which was in Private ownership. I did not know that we were looking at Newmarket until the official announcement.

Ted Richardson found Newmarket and YorkCourt - FACT. If you dont like that that fact then its tough but you will have to accept it.

If we get a possitive outcome for Newmarket I for one will raise a glass to eveyone who has been involved with bringing the project together - including Ted.

Back on topic.....under the Freedom of Information act, are we not allowed to specifically request how much this is actually costing LCC ????

Not for another 500 years.

Ehh...???

Edited. Grow up.

WT.