Then you would be correct then as i am not......go to the top of Sandal Wildcats Class



Why the hell do you all assume that normal residents of Wakefield would want this so that anyone who doesn't must have some affiliation to some organisation or connection with other clubs.

Get used to the fact that normal everyday people in Wakefield Don't want this blight on our land.....SIMPLE

Hardly 200 acres is it mate

No but is 200 acres of [u=#0040FF[size=200national significance[/size[/u?

Like I expected; you'd read the doc but miss my point of reference.

Just out of interest; how many GCSE's did you get (D-U don't count btw)

15,000 did. And so did the democratically-elected representatives of normal everyday people.

No, wait, Falmouth, I apologise. Your well-reasoned argument has changed my mind. Get off our former colliery sites and fields that run alongside a very busy motorway!! Let's join together and fight this. When the bulldozers arrive, let's lie in front of them and put an end to this madness. I will allow you the privilege of going first though.

Can I drive the bulldozer?

When it states "more than of local significance" it doesn't mean that this refers to National significance, this is your assumption, it can mean a development that affects bordering villages, towns or cities and in this case it plainly does affect Leeds and it also has the effect of joining areas together which are seperated by a certain amount of green belt land (this in itself is part of government legislation) and this is the major concern of Leeds Council and WILL be the major concern of the SOS.

Just looking at your sig!!

You have either spelled it wrong(ou missing !!) or
Could you be a brighton fan,re new ground.
How ironic would that be!!!!!!!!!!!!

A football fan more than rugby who knows all the ins and outs of a Cas fringe prop who may or may not ever have been linked with a move to Trinity?
I think Foulmouth is a serial pork pie teller.

I think this has to rank as my best ever thread! It was probably quite boring to start with but now... wow... what a first class thread!

And TRB's on holiday and missing it!

Keep Falmouth2010/Outwood Tiger I say, he/she/it is highly entertaining!

More, more, more...

Good question. Why do people constantly rise to the bait?

The poster now knows what is and isn't acceptable, or at least, he should do.

This is not a freak show, or at least it wasn't until outwoodfalmouthbrighton tiger turned up.
Please show some decorum!!

Yes, that evening in, sifting through the stats has really paid off, hasn't it? Thanks.

My pleasure and it was not really a full evening... just 30 minutes or so while watching a bit of TV before bed.

I am thinking that when I get really bored I can put all the data into Excel and post some nice looking graphs and pie charts!

Hmmm pie charts!!!!

I still do not know what this tool's legal objection to the development is.

Its a shame i missed this TRB guy, having read a lot of his posts, now he really is a first class idiot.
All the hope he's given you ...... and for what???

It looks like Leeds City Council wrote to Wakefield prior to the planning meeting of the 22nd October -

[urlhttp://cominoweb.wakefield.gov.uk/Planning/StreamDocPage/obj.pdf?DocNo=4507975&PageNo=1&content=obj.pdf[/url

They were all so scared by Leeds threat to strongly object to the SoS they decided to vote it through unanimously anyway!

My favourite bit is this -



Well central government disagreed with Wakefield's draft core strategy and they have been given a legal requirement to find 95ha on the M62 corridor! I bet you would love to get Yorkcourt to build in Leeds instead of Wakefield wouldn't you, rubbing your hands with the prospect of those juicy business rates and been lectured by Leeds for building on green-belt, one of the worst authorities in England for doing just that to Wakefield, one of the best in England. This is the authority that told Sheffield to keep it's nose out of it's business over the Leeds Arena development as well. Hypocritical does not go far enough!

Why do i need a legal objection to it personally? the legals will be argued about by the SOS in due course but my involvement is the same as yours purely emotional...... i like otters!!

You lot (and York court properties) are not legally obliged to drive a coach and horses through green belt laws and have a stadium and industrial estate built that nobody wants or needs (except for 500 die hard fans), you have no legal right to a stadium.

He's gone on holiday, he is not dead (well I hope not anyway!). Are you not planning on sticking around to lecture him as well... he will be gutted!

I do too... but I struggle to eat a whole one on my own!

Of course, i would love to speak with him too, he's a legend to you lot aint he...lol!!
All depends on wether your gate keepers boot me off, they are already warning me for not being in total agreement with you all......Priceless!!!

Oh no, how upsetting for you.

I'm gutted for you, no really, I am.

I suspect the warning was more likely for calling SWC a 'nonce', although in your own inimitably ironic style, you mispelled it; equally priceless!!!!

lolz



etc etc

I don't know, you try and give people a chance and how do they repay you?

I had more rope saved for you, but you just didn't need it. Clever boy.