Not that mods would use their powers to out anyone on here anyway!!!

Have to say thats very underhand. I hope Wakefield council are able to find the individual who posted that and takes the appropriate action. I'm suprised it hasn't been taken down given the libelous remarks.

I wouldn't mind betting there have been other posts from that IP address on RL fans.

=#FF0000AUP 2.2.


We can make a start with you if you like

It would seem that all is not what it seems with some people!

All the claims are on the back of issues that have been met in the application and all hinge on the UDP, this document classified parts of the site in 2003, and as stated can be reclassified in 2013, the council will have had a plan for the area all along, it just so happens that 2013 fits in perfectly with the arrival of phase 2 of the development, which is the warehousing. By the time the construction starts on the rest of the site the land WON'T be green field anyway.

No UDP, no case. What we need the council to do now is to publicly commit to the reclassification now. They have always said the site is to be developed "at some point", well they know as well as the rest of the population of Wakefield NOW IS THAT TIME! THIS IS OUR CHANCE! While we should bend over backwards to reassure and work with residents of Newmarket, Stanley and Bottomboat as well as any other neighbouring WF area we need a strong council that will tell the "LSwhatever NIMBY's" (as well as Leeds council should they step in at any time) to mind their own business and leave affairs of Wakefield to it's citizens and council.

Over to you Mr Box and Co. Screw this up and I will wash my hands of the city!!!

Just had someone delivering the Red Alert door to door along my road in Stanley ... told him to post mine straight into the dustbin

quite alarmed that there was 90 against comments posted yesterday on the wakefield council website

I would prepare yourself for more over the coming week. Do not underestimate the factor of the bandwagon jumpers. As i said before, most people have taken the flyers at face value and written in without looking over the planning doc's and forming an opinion for themselves. I had to laugh at one guy who lives in Stanley who mentioned that the first he had heard of this development was when he received the flyer thorough the door and it was typical of Wakefield council that this was the case. I wonder where he has been living for the past 4 months?

57% against,43% for the development!If you haven't made your voice heard yet now's the time!

I'd have thought that tomorrows' game would be a good chance to let it be known to all Wakey fans that if they haven't made a comment on the WMDC site now is the time ,with only about 114 for the application,that leaves a large proportion of Wakey fans that haven't commented yet.If we could get a few hundred people to make sure they register and comment out of the thousands of fans there it would make a huge difference.

Could I just ask a question - who owns the land we are hoping to build on? Is it all owned by the council or does the developer own some/all of it? Sorry if this has already been mentioned but there have been so many threads about the stadium that I have lost track. Thanks

I was under the impression the majority land is owned by Yorkcourt.

To be fair, I think that is exactly what you need to get organised. If you produce a basic flyer, explaining why it is important (the WCCG flyer getting lots of attention from people just wanting to moan at Wakefield City Council) that they put in positive comments. Ask them to look at the SWAG counter flyer online, and then go to the planning web site and make positive comment.

Will the club not run them through the photocopier for you as a favour? If you made them A5 size and got a two boxes of cheap photo copy paper, you could run off 10,000 in not much time at all? What about a local printers? Do any sponsor the club, would they run them through as favour to SWAG?

Just to let you know, I am intending to e-mail my 3 Ward 15 councillors (Stanley & Outwood), who also cover Newmarket Lane, as well as all the current members of the planning committee, and point out that the current level of objections being seen is being swayed by the flyer being commercial distributed by Face the Future Ltd. I suspect if they are unaware of it (they might not be), they may be thinking that public opinion is turning against the scheme however, I think if it is pointed out, then they will at least understand that in large part these objection are indeed people just moaning for the sake of moaning. Either way, as we all the know, the objections contained on the flyer are all addressed by the planning application, so they do not have a sound basis for objection in relation to planning law.

Another worrying objection posted today,

Commenter Type: Community Group
Customer objects to the Planning Application
Comment Reasons:
[i- Proposal conflicts with Green Belt
- Would create an undesirable precedent
Comments: The Trust is concerned at the size of this development on greenbelt land.
The Trust agrees with the comments made by West Yorkshire Ecology and would
hope that if development goes ahead it is scaled down and all the mitigation suggested
is put in place.[/i

Which Trust/Community Group?

Ms Sara Robin - address is Yorkshire Wildlife Trust, 1 St Georges Place, York

Its strange that they have responded in this way and not officially. I would've though this would've been a statutory response. Anyhow they agree with the findings of WYE which in turn Natural England have provided mitigation for.

Probably been contacted by the CCG.

From what I have read in the comments from the objectors (not the Statutory ones) I don't think I have seen a valid objection yet ... everything mentioned has been covered in the proposals/plans.

The only one not covered is the ridiculous notion that the access to Pinderfields will be somehow jeopardised because of this development.

Well that one is just bizarre -



That is the trouble with this scaremongering - an elderly friend of my mum's was panic stricken Sunday morning as she lives opposite the hospital on Pinders Heath and had received the Red Alert through her door. They are worrying and upsetting people unnecessarily just to get them to write in support of the NIMBYS.

So they just want it scaled down now? Even they know this site will be developed at some point in the future, so why should Yorkcourt want to scale back?

As for setting a precedent, well if the council announce the creation of a new UDP, which will come into action in 2013 and allocates the whole site as brown field, then no laws have been broken, no precedents set. As they cling to the UDP for dear life they must know that the document itself is coming quickly to the end of its shelf life.

This Community group is the WCCG, I honestly think the best thing that can happen at the moment is we as a city hold a general meeting on this issue. Anyone with half a brain can poke massive holes in this argument once they have read the plans, i think we should let this bloke hang himself publicly on his own lies and propaganda.
I see no reason at all for the developers to even consider scaling back plans, and if i were on their payroll i would be becoming increasingly frustrated with the lies this group (or rather individual) are perpetuating. A public forum with the WCCG, councilors and developers could rid us of this problem. Once and for all.

Derby day must be coming I haven't felt this passionate about my city in a long time!

It's good to be home!!!

think i might get me bike out this weekend and do a few burnouts outside the faggots place

or book a back sack and crack !!