I think we should hold fire a bit.
If we carry on like we are, we could cite him the week before we play them in the super 8s!

can we site Ratchford too?.
I know he didn't play but they don't seem too bothered about the facts and he's a bit good.

In all seriousness Gidley has no case to answer and I think that is working in England's favour as he is only on a grade A. Could have been worse.

I think that the MRP have got this right and he will probably get a 1 game van which will be a big blow.

I personally don't mind the Gidley not getting charged bit as it was a pretty feeble attempt.

Its the inconsistencies from week to week that annoy me more than anything.
I'm still in absolute disbelief at the Arona ban from earlier in the season. Irrelevant of any that have been and gone since, that is one of, if not the, worst decisions i have ever seen! Its right up there with the Neil Summers try on the 10m line against Bradford in the Challenge Cup all those years ago. At least in the refs defence that day (Whitfield was it??) he only had 1 view of it and he was 50 yards away!

Why would we want Gidley banning, all that would do is help Cas on Saturday.

Watch it again, i think you'll find Westerman landed the best punch.

Is that the van they transport the phesants in

1 Match ban according to Michael Carter on twitter.

Will be missed on Sunday. Its the Catalan forwards we need to keep on top of. Myler missing also helps us.

Coming in from the side, very brave.

Wonder why he didn't take the early plea.

When do you give the early plea, too early and is that an admission of guilt?

Don't think he had an EGP left.
But if he had, would he still have got 1 match?

He didn't have the option.

AE unhappy that Gidley was not up before the panel.

Of cause he wasn't up, he's a Warrington player

He should be more unhappy that cheap shot westerman wasn't

I was wrong earlier thinking Gidley was innocent....despite the disciplinary saying he didn't punch his opponent he quite clearly did having seen the slow motion vid on Twitter....crystal clear uppercut so should have been banned like England....no problem with our player being banned but it leaves a sour taste when others get away with it!

He didn't have the EGP as he has had a ban on the last 12 months....

I'm quite happy with England being banned for a game; he shouldn't have ended up in a scrap.

I'm less happy with Gidley's total exoneration; given that the MRP can examine the Moore/Heremaia incident in such forensic detail, one would have thought they could see a) Gidley throw the first punch b) Gidley throw an upper cut and c) Westerman land one on somebody.

All we ask for is consistency, yes?

yes but that would mean upsetting Denis and we couldn't have that, could we?

Lets just hope Gidley and Westerman's good fortune pays dividends for us on Saturday when both of them have blinders against Cas.

Just think how pist-off Betts and Co. will be if we beat Catalan on Sunday

I'm again puzzled at who watches these clips, gidley clearly started something, then westerman having a dig, and cox clearly going in with the head, that's just from normal sky footage,
England got what the crime deserved, but how some of Warrington players never got called forward is very very disappointing,
Overal I'm not bothered about actions of England or Moore in regards to a bit of biff, this is a new wakey side cutting its teeth in the top 6, showing we arnt going to be bullied or bossed by the so called big boys, and sometimes it boils over, but RFL need to be consistent.

Just out of interest who was the player that received a ban last season for a crush tackle, it was against Leigh I think. I have seen plenty of so called crusher tackles since the last two from Wigan v Wire. Not seen any player charged with the offence since. We often seem to find ourselves penalised without evidence , remember Dean Collis.

Micky Sio.

Wasnt this the same game when a Leigh player blatantly kicked out at Lee Smith in front of Child and got away with it