|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 5392 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 1970 | Jun 2022 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| I must admit, these new decisions are clouding the already very murky waters for mine.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 9974 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2019 | Feb 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="wildcat13"As someone who doesn't really understand the whole planning process does last nights news put our franchise bid in a stronger position or not,also does it make our bid stronger than cas's.I realise we will probably be playing in barnsley but if the stadium is looking even more likely is this better than a stadium that cas are still building as we will already be in a sl standard stadium in barnsley whereas the jungle is not of standard (i think)or is it just wishful thinking that we may still have an outside chance of being in sl after this season?Also could the news attract investors who were put off before?'"
If it prompts the SoS to act quicker in respect to our inquiry it helps, if it doesnt and we are still awaiting the result then we are still in the same boat i think.
Cas' would be stupid not to have a plan regards playing in a SL stadium, just for the additional points/marks it would give them for their franchise application if GH has not moved on.
Based on our previous app, if NM is moving on or we are at either Oakwell or Keepmoat with off field improvements i find it hard to see how our franchise can be worse than last time.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 3842 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="kinleycat"If it prompts the SoS to act quicker in respect to our inquiry it helps, if it doesnt and we are still awaiting the result then we are still in the same boat i think.
Cas' would be stupid not to have a plan regards playing in a SL stadium, just for the additional points/marks it would give them for their franchise application if GH has not moved on.
Based on our previous app, if NM is moving on or we are at either Oakwell or Keepmoat with off field improvements i find it hard to see how our franchise can be worse than last time.'"
I agree that our bid would be stronger than last time but if the RFL dont want us in then they wont, however the way i see it unless Cas managed to get their stadium built extremely quickly then there is no way that their application can be better than ours is so they would have to get rid of us both.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 6096 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2015 | Oct 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Naievely asking again sorry chaps but if the NM plans have been changed, slightly moved, expanded or whatever won't further planning permission be required?
Re: SL stadium, bids due April Oakwell not been announced yet and will be no guarantee on NM still and how long Oakwell required / available for? Can you see them accepted that (when they need to boot one) especially after broken promises from last bid? Wakey club or not?
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 7050 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2006 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2019 | Oct 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="altofts wildcat"I agree that our bid would be stronger than last time but if the RFL dont want us in then they wont, however the way i see it unless Cas managed to get their stadium built extremely quickly then there is no way that their application can be better than ours is so they would have to get rid of us both.'"
Where's the logic in this? Loopholes aren't going to do you any favours, and your financial difficulties right now would surely leave a huge black mark?
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 9974 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2019 | Feb 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="J20"Naievely asking again sorry chaps but if the NM plans have been changed, slightly moved, expanded or whatever won't further planning permission be required?
Re: SL stadium, bids due April Oakwell not been announced yet and will be no guarantee on NM still and how long Oakwell required / available for? Can you see them accepted that (when they need to boot one) especially after broken promises from last bid? Wakey club or not?'"
The plans havent changed, just the make up of the land usage which now clearly makes Newmarket the prefered site to comply with the governments own requirements, made to Wakefield council planning dept, for their development plan.
We've kind of worked them into a corner, where if they are arguing, they are arguing against themselves, and they will have to come up with a more suitable site to turn it (Newmarke) down.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 3842 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="J20"Naievely asking again sorry chaps but if the NM plans have been changed, slightly moved, expanded or whatever won't further planning permission be required?
Re: SL stadium, bids due April Oakwell not been announced yet and will be no guarantee on NM still and how long Oakwell required / available for? Can you see them accepted that (when they need to boot one) especially after broken promises from last bid? Wakey club or not?'"
Oakwell or whereever the super league standard stadium is will be confirmed and included in our application and they are just ironing out the final details as far as i am aware. It will be a tenancy agreement much the same as most of the teams in super league such as Wigan and Hull have with their ground owners so with the SL standard stadium we will be in a good posistion regarding our application.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 3842 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="BD"Where's the logic in this? Loopholes aren't going to do you any favours, and your financial difficulties right now would surely leave a huge black mark?'"
I agree, our finances would put a black mark next to us but if we do stay solvent and are playing in an SL standard stadium then i feel that we have a better application than Salford, Cas and Crusaders.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 16 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2010 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2012 | Apr 2012 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="danny boy1"The worry if that happens, is that the developer wouldn't need to use WTWC and the stadium as a trojan horse in order to get planning through and could save themselves millions (watch your backs)'"
I've never even thought of this, but that is very worrying. I think we all know our stadium was a sweetener for the units. Yorkcourt can just wait till 2012 and build all their units without needing to spend 20 million on our stadium! I wouldn't be suprised now if they withdraw the current planning application and sit and wait for the LDF to be approved.
I hope I am wrong, but I've got a very bad feeling about this now.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 5086 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2022 | Nov 2022 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="BD"Where's the logic in this? Loopholes aren't going to do you any favours, and your financial difficulties right now would surely leave a huge black mark?'"
Surely not, after all entering administration seems to be OK with the RFL/Super League now. They have removed that proviso from the application process I believe (only way they could keep Crusaders!!)
And yes, before everyone replies I know there are different rules for clubs they do want and ones they don't
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 126 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2010 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2012 | Dec 2012 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| You are all utterly stupid! How on earth can you as a club have a more appealing application, you are still been held up with your stadium. The funds are not there, the club are even asking you for £500,000 because not one person will invest in you as a club, stop been so naive, you are not better than castleford or Salford and on the same field as Quins and crusaders and you can't deny any of that at all, for the past you have been threating, and have good reason to!! Stop it with your utter stupidity
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Moderator | 12508 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
Moderator
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 9974 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2019 | Feb 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| and how is your application better than ours, please explain?
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Moderator | 12508 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
Moderator
|
| Quote ="kinleycat"and how is your application better than ours, please explain?'"
Because the RFL have already told him!
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 9974 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2019 | Feb 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="BD"Where's the logic in this? Loopholes aren't going to do you any favours, and your financial difficulties right now would surely leave a huge black mark?'"
Time will tell you may be right.
The way I see it, we are putting pressure on the SoS to see that he is arguing against his own policy, he will have to come up with answers (basically a different site) in order to turn down NM.
Time wise we are still behind the black ball, but it adds weight to our bid, likewise the finance thing is no longer an issue, the franchise format has changed and no longer takes into account going into admin etc, although it adds weight to the RFLs arguament should they want you out.
Now as long as our bid is stronger than one other clubs "in theory" we should be ok.
While ever cas are waiting on GH they are pretty much in the same boat as us, and with this news yesterday we have shuffled forward a little bit further.
It still stinks but we are putting forward as best a case to the SoS and SL as we can, and I think NM is almost inevitable but if that either is in time for SL decision time or wether cas and us are still in the same situation? Like I said time will tell.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 126 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2010 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2012 | Dec 2012 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 5793 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2007 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2014 | May 2013 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="altofts wildcat"I agree, our finances would put a black mark next to us but if we do stay solvent and are playing in an SL standard stadium then i feel that we have a better application than Salford, Cas and Crusaders.'"
I'm not sure how you come up with that idea
Even if we are still at wheldon road (and i beleive that would only be for the first few matches of the season) you would only have a better stadium, cas would have better finances, youth development, crowds, be further on with our ground and be (considerably) less reliant on imports. Whilst our league positions have averaged the same the last two years.
If it were only about the ground cas could easily say we will play our first few home matches in donny till our ground is finsished and sort the problem out easily.
As for salford construction of there ground has already started, you have better crowds than them but they have better finances.
As for quins and crusaders they are protected and everyone knows it.
Personally i dont want trin out of sl as i would miss our rivalry (and rfl would see hudds as our 'local rivals' even though they never have been) but i dont know if thats possible with the recent news. From the outside looking in, it looks like admin then 3 years rebuilding in the championship may be the best thing to gaurentee trins survival, but i dont claim to know all the facts so that may not be the case.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Moderator | 12508 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
Moderator
|
| Quote ="Ctrlfc10"It is nice that you try to come back with arrogance and picking up on my punctuation and grammar, it doesn't stray away from fact that your still in the same boat as before, the club has only given you ifs and maybes and potential plans as it will quieten you up as fans for longer but there is that huge fact of £500,000 which is a problem and the fact that you still have had outline permission under scrutinisation! Nothing you or others can say can prove or alter the fact you are still in the same place
Thank you mr English teacher'"
Now you have had a strop, do you not consider it arrogance to call us all stupid?
Especially when it isn't us all stating we have a better application than the afore mentioned clubs?
Its also rather ironic of a Crusaders supporter (a club I personally don't have a problem with) to come on here and (attempt) to preach to us about our finances.
Your posts are clumsy, non factual and rather ignorant.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 791 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2012 | Oct 2012 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="kinleycat"and how is your application better than ours, please explain?'"
3 simple points I believe clear this remark up;
1. Outline planning permission granted.
2. Full planning application submitted.
3. Not having to publicly beg our fans for £500K within 3 weeks or we may go bust.
Hope the above helps clear this matter up
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Moderator | 12508 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
Moderator
|
| Quote ="Riggins"3 simple points I believe clear this remark up;
1. Outline planning permission granted.
2. Full planning application submitted.
3. Not having to publicly beg our fans for £500K within 3 weeks or we may go bust.
Hope the above helps clear this matter up
'"
So, Crusaders are having a new ground built?
Have you changed your allegience from Cas to the Crusaders?
2 points I believe you need to read and digest before attempting to clear the previous remark up.
HTH.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 4946 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Riggins"3 simple points I believe clear this remark up;
1. Outline planning permission granted.
2. Full planning application submitted.
3. Not having to publicly beg our fans for £500K within 3 weeks or we may go bust.
Hope the above helps clear this matter up
'"
Buy a brick instead
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 5793 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2007 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2014 | May 2013 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="REDWHITEANDBLUE"Buy a brick instead
'"
Psst that idea came from the fans, not the club
And from all accounts its done rather nicely.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 9974 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2019 | Feb 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Riggins"3 simple points I believe clear this remark up;
1. Outline planning permission granted. =#00BF00does not = stadium
2. Full planning application submitted.=#008000does not = stadium
3. Not having to publicly beg our fans for £500K within 3 weeks or we may go bust.=#008000in the eyes of SL it doesnt count.
Hope the above helps clear this matter up
'"
=#004000hope this clarifies a few points for you
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 15521 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2020 | May 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Some of you dingbats appear to have taken a wrong turn on your way to the VT; please move along and let the grown ups talk.
Quote ="pyeman"From the outside looking in, it looks like admin then 3 years rebuilding in the championship may be the best thing to gaurentee trins survival, but i dont claim to know all the facts so that may not be the case.'"
I agree with you; based on the scant information coming out of the club right now and the large amount of rumour and speculation that is filling the gaps, it would seem that the best option is administration, a bargain buy-out and a few years in the Championship to rebuild, ending up in NM and a strong bid for the next round.
In reality though, we have no idea what will happen over the coming weeks; the only thing that is a certainty, is that some short-sighted eejits will wish our club out of existence for the betterment of their own, without realising that they're next against the wall.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 38 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Nov 2010 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2011 | Jan 2011 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="altofts wildcat"I agree that our bid would be stronger than last time but if the RFL dont want us in then they wont, however the way i see it unless Cas managed to get their stadium built extremely quickly then there is no way that their application can be better than ours is so they would have to get rid of us both.'"
Wow those rose tinteds are extra strong, will you be there for the application ????
|
|
|
|
|