not for me thanks...did ok when with us but jack of all master of none imo

I reckon common sense tells you that Boyd2 is right in what he says - think about it. We know for absolute certainty that Broughy is bankrupt - its a fact and proof is available in the public domain.

Now I am no expert in bankruptcy but I reckon its a fair bet that a condition of it is that you are obliged to pay your creditors a certain percentage of your income for a set period of time - lets assume 3 years, so say for example Wakeys offer was (complete guess work on frigures by the way):

£120k per year for 4 years, say for arguments sake (and easy rounding) that he is obliged to pay 50% to his creditors for 3 years.

Year 1 £120k Danny "sees" £60k
Year 2 £120k Danny "sees" £60k
Year 3 £120k Danny "sees" £60k
Year 4 £120k Danny "sees" £120k

Total contract value = £480k
Total value to Danny = £300k

Then for arguments sake say that Hudds offer looks something like this:

Year 1 £60k Danny "sees" £30k
Year 2 £60k Danny "sees" £30k
Year 3 £60k Danny "sees" £30k
Year 4 £140k Danny "sees" £140k
Year 4.5 £140k Danny "sees" £140k

total contract value = £460k
Total value to Danny = £370k

Less money, but the contract is structured in such a way that benefits the player despite it being "worth" less on paper in total.

The there is the possiblitity of other "incentives" that maybe Ted wouldn't offer but somebody else might?

Whether he's gone for less or not is of little interest to me. It matters not, he's gone. Look forward not back.

Do we really need to rake over the personal financial details of anyone on here? Brough has gone, end of. Or shall we rake over the details of every person that left this club - for example Julian O'Neill?

How about, and here's a novel thing, concentrating now on who is still in Wakefield colours than those who are not?

Not often I agree with you t-r-i-n-i-t-y but I agree 100%.

Lets move on and look forward to the future, we are still in a great position.

See, sometimes I can speak sense…seriously though, whether it is in the public domain or not, I would not like my finances being discussed in a public forum, nor do I see it as anything other than sticking the boot in to a former player.

It's as silly as cheering for Korkidas when he was playing against us at Belle Vue.

Some are more bitter than John Smith's brewery. Move on, they all leave eventually!

What's bitter? The figures are pure speculation - don't see the harm in discussing it, I am not critisizing anybody or suggesting they have done wrong.

He's gone, not really fussed about him either way now -he has one us plenty of games and is a hell of a good player when he wants to be and we will miss him - but I think the discussion is a valid one as it might be a potential reason why he has chosen to leave us for another club. It could mean, if true of course, that our board could have been finacially "out manouvered" maybe? Its worthy of discussion at the very least I reckon.

You don't want to get involved or like the topic then don't read it or post - its fairly simple in my opinion.

Thanks for the time you spent with us not all good I might add, but no player is bigger than the club and better players will come and go and life goes on, cooke could be a good signing and gives us more options with Obst and BJ , hopefully we can pull together and get a result at Warrington.

As you say though its speculation, we will never know. Its a bit pointless really IMO.
Better to move on and look forward. However if you do want to continue the discussion I shall butt
out and leave you to it!

No different to the vast majority of threads then, all speculation... It's fairly interesting, as is the other side of the deal involving Kirkmond and a certain member of our board "over-rulling" a certain somebody else, thus delaying the deal and making us look a bit daft in the process.

Interesting to see how Kirkmond goes when he gets in the side, really liked the look of him for Hudds and if he gets over the injury continues to improve then we could have a serious player on our hands - shame we will have to hand him back though.

This is a hard 1. Brough did not want to play for us anyway so i would rather get rid of someone who doesn't and this saves creating unrest for the rest of the year. Dale Morton can start playing well again now without a impetulant so so getting in his way.As for getting Korki Hudds would not play him anyway and Kirmond back from a broken leg so we train him up for a year to help Huddersfield out. Glad Brough has gone but as for the deal it is not great.

Shame Broughy has gone, I will miss watching him play, he was/is a special player IMHO. But we move on, we will never know the full financial 'in's and out's' of the deal, but im sure the BOD did the best they could for Wakey.

As Rebel has said - the £150K is a figure offered TO Danny, not FOR Danny.

The financial details have been kept private and should stay that way!

TBH am glad that the deal is done and we can move on, as we only have to play shudss the once i hope that danny helps them beat all our rivals in superleague

when broughy came there were an awful lot of undecideds both on here and in the stand, so we sign a player without a fee and get a couple years from him and then pick up a fee, and the way the korki deal works is very much to the clubs advantage

As Feline said on another thread. Let's concentrate on the players who want to play in the RW&B. He's gone- will he be missed? only time will tell. But he's gone.

Onwards and Upwards

No chance of locking this is there?

You're talking garbage and you know it, there is a little sum of money going a certain way to placate a certain group of shall we say businessmen that you are choosing to ignore, stop twisting stuff to suit yourself. You are Danny Brough or his missus or far far worse his parasite agent, I claim my £5.

The sum paid to wakefield for brough is closer to the young player fee you would see paid to a club if Huddersfield had taken one of your youth products

Kirmond will get a decent wage from wakefield for the rest of the season and get some game time whilst coming back from his injury. Korkidas since his arrival in the UK only seems to want to play for wakefield

I don't think anyone gives a rats any more. Huddersfield are happy with the deal, Wakefield are happy with the deal, Brough is happy, Korki is happy, Kirmond I'm sure will be happy when he gets playing again and has the chance to show everyone how good he is...

This has gone beyond boring now.

No one on here knows the financial details of the deal - FACT

It went beyond boring about 6 pages ago, and still we have no nowt nobs from Hudds continually posting tripe on our board!

I think some members on here do know the financial details. Perhaps one of the directors of wakefield wildcats?

newgroundb4cas is not a director.

true, no way would he accept the drop in salary!

I don't think I actually stated which member was a director?

so much has happened while I've been away

wonder if Morton managed to get his hands on some one