Was always likely to get called in!!

Calm down.

The standard issue council letter sent to you when they have received your comments advises that the decision will be purely based on planning issues and it doesn't follow that a lot of objections will lead to the plans getting rejected and vice versa.

The real ones to take notice of are the statutory responses. The only bad one is the West Yorkshire Ecologists report which Natural England has provided resolutions to the objections.

As I have explained before the application will automatically be called in by Government Office. What is required is that it is then passed back to the Council for determination rather than being referred to a Public Enquiry.

It does not matter how many letter of objection are received provided the reasons for the objections are considered and addressed. I recall that the main reasons for objections were drainage issues, loss of green belt, traffic and noise.

All these issues have been addressed by YorkCourt in the Traffic Impact Assesssment, Flood Impact Studies, Noise Studies and the Environment Impact Assessment. If these issues have been addressed to the satisfaction of the Council then there is no reason why the objections will have any impact.

Natural England are not objecting so my main area of concern, loss of habitats have been addressed.

I woulkd not be too concened by the objections provided YorkCourt are on the case which I'm sure they will be, however it wont hurt if letters of support are received. I would urge anyone who has not submitted a positive comment to do so.

Might be a good idea to try and drum up support from fellow RL fans! I'm sure they'd all support a new stadium to take their families too. Might be worth commenting on tourism and money it would bring to Wakefield.

theirs a letter in the y.e p today. it is the main letter with the headline DEVELOPERS PUT GREEN LUNG IN PERIL! it is from a Woodlesford resident complaining about loss of greenbelt between wakey and leeds, extra traffic including delays to pinderfields!? it also encourages readers to view maps on the CCG website and send protest letters before the april 8th deadline. i think its time the club,fans and developers step up our charm offensive. the future of our club is at stake and we cannot allow these nimbies to end 135 years of a precious institution.

Go on then mate,be my guest.

apologies,just seen the other thread

these objectors drive me mad though!

Got a leafet today from one of the distributors, they ain't happy delivering em.

Who aint? Is someone being paid to do this?

Of course the distributors are being paid to drop them, but the person who gave me this one would rather not be doing it.

I'll find out more and get back to you.

if they are it would be interesting to find out who,s paying them?

Richard Wright !!!

=#8040FFHe isn't that smart/evil

and I think for the good of Cas, Wakey need to stay in SL

We all know who is paying them... just look at this thread on page 1! A Giants fan traced the 'whois' on the website and posted it, along with a link to their business website.

And they have every right to if they wish

Absolutely, but neither should you guys keep the fact that it is a resident and not some 'Community Conservation Group' a secret either. BTW not suggesting that you name and shame, just that it is a resident of Newmarket Lane.

who actually owns/operates the clinic? couldnt we offer them some cheap advertising or something?

think he,s just posted on the cas forum!

You guys??





I have no idea who is behind it or really care. It seems to me that alot of Wakey fans assumed that this was all done and dusted but I think it may be a long time coming.

Don't worry - be happy!



We can ride this one out - but we may to do a little more work!

More objection letters came in today; 44 in total with 7 for. Bizarrely two objections letter came from the same address in Kent?! See link in my sig for the latest figures.


We need a big push to establish the advantage we had before the scaremongering flyers went out last Friday. Please get all the people you know to write in with their support for the development.

It’s fair to say the supporting column to a battering today: 90 – 7.

Some of the rubbish I’ve seen makes me fear for this country. I imagine an extremely small percentage will have considered the plans as a lot the objections have been covered.

When they go on about losing footpaths and cycle tracks it’s clear they have no idea what they’re on about. Still, the planners will ignore rubbish such as this a look at the actual details rather then frenzied scribbles from people who do not know what they’re objecting about.

We need to give this a BIG push now then. Lets get those letters in and fast!!

I see something calling itself lard has made its first ever post on the cast site with a link to our nimby friends. Can the mods find out who this thing is ?

IP tells us very little, but i would suggest its a NIMBY.