well that makes it head to head now....

Giants 24
Wildcats 9

With a bit of luck he's following the trend of switching codes.

and yet our trophy cabinets are pretty similar

Attendance... 8.4k thought there was more there than the Hull KR game which had 9.6k? Deffo not any less.

Anyone else think this?

Deffo more today than the KR game

Yep, count me in.

More at the KR game than today imo.

Classy. Some Huddersfield fans will be embarrassed by you. Your choice I guess.
Your numbers are wrong by the way and you are clearly a new comer as you don't realise rugby was played before super league started.

If you did you'd know you have a great record over the last century.
Anyway keep watching, you might learn something.

Agree, sometimes it's hard to tell but today it looked a little light on the Hull KR game.

There wasn`t enough room, we were like sardines where we were, and the view diabolical.

Yes I thought the same , deco more there today.

Even had trouble getting parked today which is very unusual

Because the second row and loose forward were not packing in right, allowing them a quick break from the scrum.

I don't know where you get this idea that silverwood likes hudds. He was thrown out of our stadium after him and his Leeds mates had too much to drink, made tits if themselves and racially abused a member of staff. He was suspended as a result - so I wouldn't expect he'd be in any Rush to do us any favours!

Give over, there was plenty of room. you could see spare terracing towards the covered area. If you all choose to stand so closely thats up to you. As for your view, If it was that bad, please do write to our club and complain. Perhaps demand a refund...in fact, why not go the whole hog and write to the RFL, maybe suggest we be thrown out of superleague for it

He may not have rushed but, he certainly did you some favours today

That happens every week in every game though and refs aren't that pedantic about it

Did u a few too to be fair, Poore punch not even on report, Mullally has a broken nose from one of numerous high shots which went unpunished. He was e as try all are and completely inconsistent.

Wakey were best team today and should have won but it wasn't down to Silverwood that you didn't!

I didnt see Poore throw a punch, but I was some distance away, so if he has, he ought to be dealt with appropriately. However your comment is irrelevant because he doesn't have to be put on report to be cited and disciplined for punching. Its now with the match review panel to decide.

as for the whole argument over silverwood. There is a very strong argument to suggest he missed a massive forward pass which lead to your try which made it 8-18 and there is also an argument to suggest he called our last 'try' forward incorrectly. If it turns out that he has made two pivotal calls incorrectly, and when you consider the scoreline, you could say that his actions/lack of actions have had a significant effect on the result of todays game.

I was far too far away to make a call on whether silverwood got our decision right or wrong - Im awaiting the television replay before I pass comment. However I was bang in line for your try and that was definitely a forward pass, which was also acknowledged by the huddersfield fan that I attended the game with.

I think game was nip and tuck throughout with us edging the last 25 minutes. However, once again huddersfield defended very well in that period and in a game which I think was played by two sides who were better in defence than attack, you probably did enough in that period to deserve the win.

The facts are, we'll throw todays kitchen sink at other teams and we'll give them a good hiding and you'll shut some good teams out with defence like that.

Poore didn't throw a punch this poster basically made that up. I think another Wakey player attempted it probably Mathers but no contact made.

You better be damned sure of that because I know one of his "mates" and I'll make damn sure he knows what you posted - still sure of yourself big man?

You do know how easy it is to find out who you are?

You've probably already thought of taking a screen shot of the aforementioned, before the OP deletes it, haven't you?

Yup, including the title bar.

Not if you use stereotyping as part of your investagative technique.

As for the allegation it was widely reported at the time.

www.superleaguefans.com/rugby-le ... uties.html

www.superleaguefans.com/rugby-le ... uties.html

Oh please don't set your mates on me- is your dad bigger than mine too.
You let him know- you kick us as much fuss as you like- I'm sure he will appreciate it given how well the RFL did to keep it quiet. If he wants to PM me I can give him my address.

Really yet you are posting it al over a public forum thus nullifying your own theory. I reckon I'll still pass it on nothing to lose now is there you big tough cyber warrior you.