It seems no compromise has been reached because it has been advertised by macron today?

That would now appear the case - which is what AG said though not I assume the outcome he wanted.

We will never get to the truth but it makes you wonder if it would have been cheaper to pay the original bill.

The dispute with Macron is down to AG not been happy with the standard of product. Is that correct ? If this is right why wasn't this brought up when the kit was originally sold at the beggining of last season ?

Hindsight is a wonderful thing, still I dont think it means we have "lost" as it were.

I seem to remember hearing that they had also delivered a load more stock than we asked for and then billed us for it. Did I imagine that? or can anyone else remember that?

This could be an issue of timing - the publication of the Gazette means that often, these things are published even though they've been resolved, because the resolution happened after the publication deadline; that happened to me earlier this year over a mix up with some returns.

I believe it was just quality issues on goods and that Macron refused to accept them as returns.

It was quality and issues with erroneous sizing - I provided a statement to that effect, as I was deeply dissatisfied with the Macron replica shirts I bought for me and the kids.

So it's all your fault?
The fi-ta gear is worse IMO!
Pay up!!
Move on!!!
End of!!!!
Till the next bill arrives from a supplier?
Unfortunately this is how AG operates!!!!

Well I think we can guess where the (early) early bird ST money is going.