Get a life squire.

No he was fine and if we come on here slating our guests who are we going to be able to invite in future? Please leave it. Thank you

Then you are suggesting? i intended to make him look stupid.
If that is the case, i certainly did not, i expressed my opinion and that his (IMO) indiscrete comments could be used to make him look stupid.

Not "slating" anyone, i answered what i thought was a fair question with what i thought was a fair answer.
If people want to ask me about my post of course i will respond, although i am happy to leave it.

Misjudged this one didn't you, not leading the populist bandwagon yelping like a banshee is not your style. Still your windbag mates will be along to rescue you soon

Explain misjudged, my opinion is my opinion, i am not, unlike you under the necromancers spell, i see what i see and don't feel the need to go along with anyone else's flow, so i don't need rescuing.
It's easy to support what's going well, it doesn't make it populist, it just means, i don't feel the need to swim against the tide as you sometimes do.
What i do like though is the way that you are warming to the new regime (almost becoming populist yourself), it is most commendable, and i am sure it goes against your every fibre.
Yet again though you reveal the spoilt child inside trying to make mischief out of what you consider to be a winnable argument that will somehow make you look all important, like in the glory days!!!


The thing is, that things are now as they should be, try as they might, nobody has Glovers ear, what is secret remains secret, nobody has the inside track, and that starves jumped up cretins such as yourself, the glorifying oxygen you seek.
How Ted must be hurting though at your turning!!!

No I am not suggesting you are trying to make him look stupid, the top post are your words not mine, its you what is giving the impression that if you wanted you could have made him look that way, the place was full, there was a good atmosphere plenty of positives to be taken from the night, it was understandable that the WE editor would be made a touch uncomfortable but to have a go at Ben Thaler whose only interest was to keep the matter light hearted gets a moan from just two people on here. I was going to say its interesting but I will change that because interesting its not but its noticable that you kept quiet last night and did not push him further on his answers,

nah can't think why.

It does not suggest anything of the sort, it clearly states ANYONE with an interest......, nowhere does it say I.
The fact of wether or not i felt the need to "challenge" him over it, is simply i wasn't that bothered about what he chose to say and wether or not it could be harmful to him.
The fact a question was asked about it after the event, and i gave my opinion, doesn't mean i am going to irate or angry about what he said, just simply it was my opinion.
Mountain and molehill.

Well why do you feel the need to say it on here then? if you were not bothered.

I was answering a question.
I don't agree with the Libyan regimes treatment of it's people, bit I haven't found the need as yet to join the rebellion.

so when are the club going to announce that wildie has resigned

It was confirmed last night so I am surprised that it isn't on the website today.

He hasn't resigned, he's re-signed!

No moaning here - when I asked the question about Mr Thaler, it was a genuine question; I haven't been to many events like that and certainly have never seen a referee participate in an open forum, so I didn't know what to expect and had nothing to gauge his reactions against. He definitely didn't shirk the questions - the forward pass one was mine (think my bit of paper must have been on top) and he gave an honest answer to that, and the one about the Ferres try.

I will have to take your word for that, its not stopped you giving it a mention though, do you have anything else you want to get off your chest while your at it?.

Not happy about people taking advantage of confused cows!

I'm sure it was, it was not and still isn't my intention to criticise your question, I only included you in my post because kinleycat used your name in an attempt to gain support for his negative post and on that basis if you agreed with him then I thought you were both wrong, hope that,that clears up any uncertainty.

Perhaps they should not attempt to read into your posts' then

Ry21 did you write up the minutes if so where are they?

Many Thanks

A big well done to all those who have given time and effort to get this off the ground, at a time when others were fighting amongst themselves and blaming others you dug in and tried to make a difference.

You are special people and you have my gratitude, thank you.

Well said sir .

*windbag arrives*

Stop the back biting lads. We're better than that, we're WT men!

Absolute garbage, Bren asked the question, I answered it in my opinion.
The fact that I mentioned anyone was to clarify a point that clearly wasn't grasped as to, I was only answering a question. Wether anyone agrees, disagrees or whatever is not, was not or never will be relevant as it was my opinion.
Forgive me if I misunderstand the purpose of the forum, I didn't realise it was just for everyone to agree and anyone who doesn't is a heretic, I thought that was just the policy applied by vastman.

deleted this as is was garbage.

The evening was excellent, you should have come.
It's probably just the forum that's worth missing out on, sometimes.