Bradfords strength is in the pack and the platform they provide for their best player, Lee Gaskell.

Stop Bradfords pack and you negate Gaskell!

I've gone for a big bench to maintain midfield dominance while retaining and adding some players who can get us to and through the Bulls outside channels.

IMO that's the way to beat them
dependent on fitness

L Smith
Johnstone
Tupou
Arundel
Owen
Miller
T Smith
Anderson
Sio
Scruton
Ashurst
Malloy
Washbrook

Godinet
Lauitiiti
Mulally
Walker

Simon, Yates, Anakin, Moore

I'd love to see Godinet back, I think his creativity could be key to unlocking the Bulls.

Walker and Mullalley can be highly influential too, they are forwards who do make the yards and work effectively.

I agree with comments on other threads, I think Johnstone should be given a game. He has fabulous pace and I think his positional awareness has improved considerably since Brian Smith arrived. He could revel in this sort of match.

MUST win game. Let's get BV packed and make some serious noise for the boys.

Over 6,000 at Bradford yesterday. If we get close to that number on Saturday at least we'll have something to be thankful for.

Owen
Johnstone
Smith
Arundel
Tupou
Anderson
Sio
Scruton
Molloy
Ashurst
Simon

Godinet
Lauitiiti
Mullaly
Walker

Depending on injuries, I don't think there will be too many changes from yesterday.
Smith looked good at FB, so leave him there and try and find a spot for Ali, someone who can win a game single handed.

Tim Smith second half was the best he's been all season so, maybe the worm has turned and we can show the rest of "the qualifiers"
that we mean business.

Home games (and against Championship opposition) are must wins, especially for us, having come second yesterday.

I was not sure about the new league format, but I tell you what...it's rekindled our season and the fans interest. We are now talking about the games & looking forward to them with excitement & anticipation.

Never thought I would say this, but.....well done The RFL!!

Hard to call as I haven't seen Bradford play at all this year; they've violated us plenty of times in the past mind you, which is enough to make me feel decidedly uneasy about this one.

The good thing from our pov yesterday is that every member of our 18man squad has had SL or NRL experience. And experience of playing at that pace and intensity. So it shouldn't be a surprise.

Slight gamble from our side is that Dane Neilsen will be parachuted straight into a centre berth at the expense of (probably) Henry rather than Purtell.

This'll be good. We took about 2k to Leigh at the start of the season, this run of (effectively) 7 cup finals has really caught the imagination and we should take the same again I would think.

It's only the 2nd game and the stakes are huge. I don't know if my nerves will take this. I love sport...

Anderson is poor weak player ( anyone know why he was allowed to go to Amsterdam the weekend before a big game ) , Simon is not a 13, Moore is a poor player.
Tim Smith has to play as he is our only creative player.
Got to presume that Godinet is not fit, but if was fit then Coach Smith made another poor selection. So for me he has to play against Bradford.
Anakin must play.
On paper Bradford are a much better team than us, they are bigger, fitter, faster, more skillful, have a better kicking game, have confidence from winning games. So we are going to have to be at our best to have a chance. That said we ran Salford close and they are a better team than us. I think that if Coach Smith selects the right players in their correct position we have a chance all be it a small chance of upsetting the odds.

Im sorry but I dont agree that Anderson is a weak player, he is one of the better players in our team. Nothing fancy but does his job that hes meant to do.

Jorden tansey
Tom johnstone
Joe arundal
Lee smith
Richard owen
Jacob miller
Tim smith
Ben kavanagh
M sio (godinet if fit)
A mullally
M ashurst
John molloy
A yates


A walker
A lauatiti
C annikin
D wasbrook (sio if godinet fit)


R lynne would never play for us again if up to me for how he gave up and i thought anderson and scrutton where the 2 worse forwards on pitch for me and deserve dropping

I was happy with the pack yesterday so would leave that exactly the same, except hooker maybe.
The backs were well outgunned against Salford but stood up well (ish). I don't think they'll have the same kind of onslaught against Bradford.

Our kicking game is the biggest thing that has to improve. First half was horrible, which invited Salford back on to us when we were in the arm wrestle.
If we can put an attacking kick in on the 6th tackle, or at least pin them back rather than giving them a tap on the 20 metre line it gives us much more field position.
If that one thing had changed yesterday we would have won. The other errors for me came from that issue, whether through fatigue or through having to take a chance when we should have been camped on their line.

I'd like to see Godinet in for Moore if he is fit and also wouldn't mind seeing Ali in there somewhere. He adds something a little different to our other forwards and would give Bradford problems. Either way i expect us to come out on top against them on our own ground and relatively confortably after an early arm wrestle. We'll shut them up and do them by at least a dozen.

Lynne is one of our best backs and people say he wants dropping because he can not catch chase.Chase is one of the faster players in rugby and as scored long range try,s against all teams tupou is a strong player who is getting stick for one bad call . Thinks it is funny how chase had the last laugh on the Wake,y fans who had been trying to take the p---s out of him all the game

How do you get, bigger, fitter, faster and more skilful



They've been good in a lower league and aren't as good as when they played in SL (from which they were relegated)

I think Belly should be watching Bradford then.
Apart from Annakin he doesn't seem to like anything about Wakefield.

The banter between Chase and the Wakey fans goes way back to his Cas days. He gives plenty back when he ends up on top.

How ironic it was when he moaned about a leading arm and got put on his arass

He ruined Rapartis career with probably the cheapest shot in RL history.

In all fairness I think Rangi let you off lightly after his full length try, didn't see him direct anything to the Wakefield supporters which was surprising given the grief he got.

Its more to do with him giving up with 40 meters to go

I thought our pack was poor walker mullally and molloy apart.im big fan of anderson but thought he and scruton where not at the races yesterday.but its all about opionins

Pop Tart, I have moaned about the club not having a Rugby committee to advise the board re players, as a result we have had our legs lifted. Webster was allowed to sign a bunch of useless soft forwards, only Simon has looked the part. Other than Simon and Anakin I do not remember any aggression from a single Wakey forward all season. And as for Anderson Dreadnought , wow he really bossed that Salford pack yesterday. Him and Scruton really smashed in and got us going forward. I moaned about Ian Kirke as its a disgrace that he has had the time off that he has had.This is not me being clever after the event, I was posting about it six weeks into his 16 week holiday for a slight groin pull. The time off the players have been given, the lack of fitness. The signing of known poor players , Anderson in amsterdam the week before the Salford game. The total lack of respect shown to Anakin, and the final nail in the coffin the ridiculous swap of MacShane , a real quality player, with Scot Moore, a real poor player just beggared belief. So Pop Tart I suppose you are correct there is little to like on the Rugby front. That said I understand that there was effort on Sunday and that has to be admired, the pity is that we have allowed the standard of player to drop so far that effort alone will not get us a result against Bradford and Leigh as both those teams now have superior players to us in almost every position.

You're late to the party; Wakey fans and Rangi Chase go back a lot further than his recent stop-start Salford career, hence the stick he got.

The different point of view is that I saw the same game but see good points too. I think you see them but focus on the poor aspects


The first half was frustrating but the forwards in my opinion did smahsh it around with the Salford pack. It was nip and tuck and we really tackled them hard. There were some shuddering tackles going in.
The problem was that Smith's last tackle play was just not working and although the forwards were working hard, the Salford forwards were gradually starting from further up the field.
Their tries came from field position gained by penalties which is probably from them getting the better in the tackle but we got nothing from their laying on so is hardly a criticism of our forwards.

There was one tackle from Anderson and Scruton where the whole crowd went "oof" because they smash the guy so hard.
A couple of times Scruton was the only one chasing kicks so did a lot of work that wasn't even his to do.

I have to say Molloy was particularly good yesterday and hit the line really hard and made good yards (I haven't seen the stats to back that up yet)

Now saying all that, I thought we would drop off when the props rotated but actually, for all they look like little and large, Mulally and Walker were very effective. Both have a good step and always get their heads through to make a dominent play the ball.
Was very impressed with all our props.

I thought early on that Moore was doing well as he put some big hits in too, but he gradually started making bad decisions that cost us. Sio coming on made a big difference.
Even Scruton's dropped ball was down to Moore in a lot of ways.
Scruton had just got in to position and was ready to take the ball. Moore decided to go on his own when there was really nothing on but left us with no hooker and Scruton having to rush back to cover. He then fumbled in his haste to pass it.

In the backs for all he is getting criticism from his chase back on Chase, Lyne made a lot of yards for us and worked the ball away from the line every time.
Owen made a mistake with a high ball which was poor but then, when they went back to his wing and he had a two on one with Thorneley and Jones Bishop who both were standing 10 feet tall, he picked the right option and drove BJB in to touch to win us the ball back. That's a massive improvement for him and should be recognised.

Tim Smith was poor early on with his dropped ball and poor kicks but again managed to turn it around with some absolutely perfect passing to put the guys in for tries.

In all those cases we have turned our attitude as a team around 100%. For some people to imply there was no effort is frankly insulting to those players. The fact that nearly every person who was at the game stayed behind to clap them off the field speaks volumes.

So I agree there was a lot we could improve on but they in my opinion were single issues rather than total team performance.
Hopefully we will sort out Smith's long kicking game, and our decision making at hooker but I reckon other teams have much bigger issues than us so I am still quite positive if still a little disappointed we didn't close the game out.