A quick look at the RFL disciplinary shows Moore has been charged with a less serious offence than LMS. Also notice it only refers to LMS headbutting. Moore could get away without a ban! www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... hp?id=1549

A quick look at the RFL disciplinary shows Moore has been charged with a less serious offence than LMS. Also notice it only refers to LMS headbutting. Moore could get away without a ban! www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... hp?id=1549

Doesn't it show the range of sanctions as sending off sufficient or no further action? Should be no ban coming.

Noticed it could be 1 match.

I love that Newton was only on for a bit, but still managed to get himself a disciplinary charge!

Also noticed that half the Leeds team were cited from their game - mostly for offences against Thackray!

Decision - don't do it again or we will tell you off. Again. Signed: The RFL Disciplinary Committee.

Quote ="TURFEDOUT"A quick look at the RFL disciplinary shows Moore has been charged with a less serious offence than LMS. Also notice it only refers to LMS headbutting. Moore could get away without a ban! www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... hp?id=1549'" Could be me but your link does not seem to be working. sorry it is me.

Quote ="TURFEDOUT"A quick look at the RFL disciplinary shows Moore has been charged with a less serious offence than LMS. Also notice it only refers to LMS headbutting. Moore could get away without a ban! www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... hp?id=1549'" Could be me but your link does not seem to be working. sorry it is me.

edited for consistency

What about the Leeds player who scored a try and the crusaders player came in late with elbow onto Leeds players head. He as got away with it.

Incident considered Drop on player with forearm after try in 76th minute (Delaney)
Decision No charge
Details of Charge / Reason for NF Law: 15.1(b) Detail: =#FF0000When attempting to tackle makes contact with head of opponent Player attempting to tackle opponent scoring try, unnecessary contact with head of opponent, should have avoided contact with head of opponent, careless action

Careless? Peak deliberately went in late with intent to injure. Maybe not in the circumstances he did so, but i'd say that's unsporting and deserved a one match ban at least.

SOS/NFA for Richie.

meeting is not till tuesday, how do you get this?

Quote ="1873"meeting is not till tuesday, how do you get this?'" www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... hp?id=1549 Actually, having read it again.........you are correct-a-mundo, It is 2/2/10. Richie could get 1 game. LMS 1-2. Tessa gets a letter. No charge.

Quote ="1873"meeting is not till tuesday, how do you get this?'" www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... hp?id=1549 Actually, having read it again.........you are correct-a-mundo, It is 2/2/10. Richie could get 1 game. LMS 1-2. Tessa gets a letter. No charge.

5 cited is now half is it?



With 3 involving Thackray, 2 of which were different incidents.

Bit of a drama queen aint you?

Think it was more a joke aimed at Leeds players dislike of Thackray.

Chill man.

Thanks Wildthing, your are indeed correct about the intentions of my post.

Gotcha - 3 out of 5 would constitute [imost[/i, if we wanted to get pedantic though and [ioffences[/i suggests different incidents. Is your name Ashley BTW??? How is it in Oz?

does anybody know what time will the decision be announced?

You would have thought it would be updated by now

the hearing is at 5pm l think

1 match:



It'll be interesting to see how many other players get banned for punching this season...

Its a level playing field they keep telling us, not when it comes to wakefield its not

What an absolute joke the RFL panel are. One match for a bit of argy-bargy that you see week in week out. Yellows each would have done especially with the game being early season and niggly throughout. Yet Crusaders player Adam Peek, (maliciously in my opinion) attacks the head of Delaney with his elbow splitting his head open and gets nothing except a caution. Shocking.

We will never win mate, its wakefield

The red cards were probably fair. But the aftermath punishment doesn't add. Surely use the use of head warrants more of a ban than punching. The only thing that could made this outcome could have been that LMS has a very clean discilinary record before this incident. It could be that they looked at Richards record and thought it was fair. I don't always think there is consitancy when it comes to the panel.

Although at the game I didn't see what happened, I did see the Super League show.With LMS not having an exemplary disciplinary record and appearing to be the most aggressive,how can there be such a disparity in the fines ?

The biff is officially over. A dark day indeed.

Agreed, we don't want mass punch ups but hell its a mans game.