[quote="PopTart":k3yydbi0]https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/sport/rugby-league/hull-kr-wakefield-trinity-swap-9901961
Sorry to see Booth go if this happens but Rourke probably nudged him down the list a bit.
NT is very well regarded though so not a bad deal.[/quote:k3yydbi0]
I don't think this is a good deal. Noah is a future international IMO. He already carries himself on the field like an experienced pro and has bags of potential.
I think we have made a mistake with this one but then again what do I know.
[quote="wotsupcas":2tnnaol1]I don't think this is a good deal. Noah is a future international IMO. He already carries himself on the field like an experienced pro and has bags of potential.
I think we have made a mistake with this one but then again what do I know.[/quote:2tnnaol1]
You seem to think it was the clubs decision, reading between the lines HKR were keen on Booth and could sign him for next season. He's at Hunslet anyway do the club looked at a way to get something in return and it seems like we've got a promising winger as a swap. Both players are potential only right now.
The last swap between the two clubs worked out well in the end despite the uproar it provoked
Hull KRs strategy on projects / youth at the minute seems to be throw enough mud at the wall and see what sticks, which not many seem to be sticking at all. If I was a young player from a development / career perspective this would be in the back of my mind.
Why is every young player that leaves us labelled a “future International” after a handful of games in which they are unable to nail down a first team spot.
Way I see it his utility place in the squad has been taken by Rourke for 2025 and we are adding some depth in the squad in a position we are a bit thin.
Rourke is a proven top level player in SL and of the 2 he’s the better option for Trinity going forward.
We have 4 players who are very good centres and two who can play fullback well for a few years so not sure where he is in pecking order so would go as you can't keep them all.
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
