I agree I was basically pointing out that Westerman can play prop because as you say he pretty much does already. It's more a case of adding it to his title on the players' profile page than anything else.

So in all but name, we have the following players who could be classed as props or BIG or PUNCHY middles.

Fifita
Green
Arona
Tangata
Tanginoa
Westerman

and perhaps Battye.

One more would be nice on top of that lot but 7 of these players available and hopefully injuries permitting 5 per game that should be enough, the rest is pure attitude. You combine this with the smaller but more mobile back rows you should have a well-balanced pack, Pitts, Crowther, Batchelor, Ashurst and maybe Arundel and Walker.

That's my plan anyway.

Vastman thanks for putting me right he always looked smaller than other props on the park so thought he was under 6ft thanks

I'm not sure why you are both pushing the point so hard.
I don't think anyone doubts that a good big one will always beat a good little one, but there are so many examples of big ones that coaches have trusted only to find that size is all they had.
I'd rather judge props on delivery first rather than size.

Smaller props just play a different role. If you are 5'10 you don't run at the line like Fifita and your work rate needs to be higher but there are plenty of examples of players who do that.
You can't go with all small props. You won't get out of your 10 metre area. But you can't go with all big either.

So I'd prefer to judge them on what they do and how it compliments the team rather than just judging on size.

Well, I'm not if it's me you mean, it's called a debate, this is a forum isn't it? What confuses you about that?

We don't use our props to get out of our 10 m area, it always seems to be the job of the 3/4's

That's a fair point.
In that case I change it to, we won't get over the advantage line in midfield.