Quote ="bren2k"With regard to tackle technique - I don't know what the answer is - but the current iteration of the tackle is ugly and dangerous; holding a man up while your mates run in and smash his ribs, torso and legs - then ending up in a massive, tangled dog-pile, in which you can pull on the ball and rub your elbows in his face, is almost certainly not what the rules intended. It could be sorted - if there was a will.'"
What do you suggest is done to sort it out? I agree with you btw. It's like the game has reached a crossroads where ruck speed has become the be all and end all. It never used to be like that and it used to be a better spectacle with more variation in play. I may sound like a dinosaur but I prefer the more open and entertaining style than the grind the game has become in many cases.
I would say the way the game has evolved has brought this about. The 10m rule means that the ball carrier has to be controlled to allow defences back onside and to slow the PTB. In the old days of the 5m rule play the balls were quicker because people could get back onside.
Or if you keep the 10m maybe allow far less time for tackles to be completed or not allow more than 2 tacklers in at any one time.
Possibly again reduce the number of subs so that more gaps appear and players have less strength for all the wrestling garbage?
Then again do we really need wholesale rule changes? Cas have shown they can play entertaining rugby without the cynical stuff. Perhaps we're seeing the beginnings of a change of ethos in RL from the Maguire/Wane style to something better? If Cas win things playing like this it will force others to follow. People eagerly followed the cynical Wigan style because it was effective. It's not in the NRL and we're perhaps seeing the same here now.