Take my comment in context... Several tackles that Miller made would have not been made by Sammut... So Saints may have been out of sight... I just really like Godinet and don't understand his exclusion and when the game was loose and the big Saints pack were exhausted, you could see a fast quick brained player finishing off a half break, I thought we missed Godinets link play in the game. Also McShane was responsible for at least two of the late game brainfarts... However I do not advocate a vilification of the player, as he played very well otherwise.

Oh and don't call me hoe again!

l
Lost respect for Cunningham after the Stosic incident.

That's a shame for Saints - they've generally operated at a class above some other clubs, but if they allow Cunningham to talk to the media like that on a regular basis, they'll end up coming across like Wigan.

Note - we actually lost the game, and James Webster has conducted no such churlish interview...

And now theyre saying it was a slip so was only a penalty, so I guess that's an admission they got it wrong

"The officials didn’t see a problem with it - but how has Mark split his eye open and suffered damage to his tear duct, which is inside his eye?"
Glad he put a question mark at the end of this quote - your tear duct is not "inside your eye".
Back to the anatomy lessons...

I overheard the commentators from BBC Radio Lancashire state "A controversial win for St Helens" in their post match summary. Given their mandate is to be slightly bias toward the Lancashire side for obvious reasons then I can safely assume that even they must agree that the decisions were very much in St's favour!