Quote ="steadygetyerboots-on"I do not believe that SL clubs should be able to loan players to each other (I can't think of a situation that merits it, but will happily change my mind if someone else comes up with one I haven't thought of). Why should some clubs sign up so many promising players (more than they can possibly accommodate) and then loan them out to other SL clubs to sit back and wait to see whether they're good enough? It also leaves the competition open to more criticism too. Clubs should put out the best squad/team that they can afford and not "foster" other clubs players potentially giving them a false position in the league.'"
You could in theory have a situation where you have developed a number of good young players in a certain position, who are still behind your own established players in that position, but who will not develop as they need to without game time at the required level. Clubs sign the best players they can afford, mostly on a need-now basis, so a lot of young and potentially very good players could fall by the wayside. Better for the good of the player and the game to loan them out and allow them to develop. Some will make it, some won't. In our case, thanks to our Wildcats Academy, those who don't will still have learned something that gives them a profession outside full time rugby league.