Quote ="deeHell"Yesterday League weekly run an article on the licensing system, our Chief Exec was invited to give his view. Instead of taking the chance to point the systems flaws and unfairness, the exact things that are going to see us out, he went on about the positives and how P/R was bad for the game. The whole thing was a one sided bit of propaganda that our Chief exec played along to.
Are these views really of a person that has our best interests at heart? How can he be so passionate about a system that is so flawed and corrupt that it’s going to reject a club that’s is far from the weakest. Why not take the chance in that article to question the process and lack of transparency?
I had my doubts about this guy when he jumped ship before then made a return when things didn’t work out elsewhere. At Glovers first audience with night with I asked Elston the question, would we take legal action if we are kicked out at the expense of a weaker franchise. He just went on to say that it was in our own hands to win a franchise and expansion is here to stay. This might as well be Richard Lewis talking, what the hell, it’s not like he’s a Wakey fan or the owner of this club, he just another wage earner. When were gone from SL he will probably move on to find alternative employment in the game in due course. No point rocking the boat with your RFL buddies is there James.
Mr Glover, watch carefully who you take advice off.'"
Was it the right way of doing things then? or do you think he should have taken a little extra help from the Halifax?
