Quote ="TRB"I can correct one myth stated on here - which was clarified at the meeting.
The issue of Image Rights is not resolved. The tax bill as paid by Sir Rodney is not for that element. All the various clubs liabilities on this matter are on hold pending the outcome of the Leeds case. Ours is one of the smallest amounts - and can be dealt with as and when, subject to the deal outlined coming off. If the case is won by Leeds - i.e. the clubs would owe only 15% of the full amount - then this will not be an issue to WTRLFC. If it isn't won, then it will be a large, but not insumountable bill - unlike some clubs, who's liabilities would be into 7 figures!
But hey, I'm sure our bubbly friend will still want to stick the boot in!
'"
I am not trying to stick the boot in, but just had enough of the rubbish being written about certain things!!
Exhibit A above is a prime example of what I am talking about
=#4000FF"The tax bill as paid by Sir Rodney is not for that element"
In English TRB is saying that the amount of money that Rodney Walker paid the the HMRC was nothing to do with this b*llocks about image rights, it was in fact money owed to the tax man which Wakefield had decided to spend on running the club even though it was not there money.
This is a prime example of what i mean!!
'"
I understand it now!'"
