www.wakefield.gov.uk/Planning/Sp ... efault.htm

I see no reason why this will be automatically called into the regional planning office after doing a bit of homework on the UDP and the new framework thats replacing it.
Basically, the document which classifies part of the site (in name only) is called the Unitary Development Plan (UDP), the "all encompassing" document spelled out which land you could and couldn't develop, however this document is due to be fully replaced by the Local Development Framework (LDF), which is organised in a very different manner.
Rather than having one grand scheme the local planning office reviews each case independently, with a view to how it will improve the region and what benefits it will bring. - Meaning J30 can be viewed as case on it's own by planners, aside from former classification. On this basis i think objectors would have a very serious case finding fault, when you consider the amount of documentation and depth of study that has been put in by Yorkcourt and their team.

Interestingly parts of the UDP have ALREADY been removed and replaced- For me that already seriously undermines the key point of the WCCG's cause.
This method seems very progressive and forward thinking, which is strange when you consider it was produced by Boxy and his mates!!

www.wakefield.gov.uk/Planning/Sp ... efault.htm

I see no reason why this will be automatically called into the regional planning office after doing a bit of homework on the UDP and the new framework thats replacing it.
Basically, the document which classifies part of the site (in name only) is called the Unitary Development Plan (UDP), the "all encompassing" document spelled out which land you could and couldn't develop, however this document is due to be fully replaced by the Local Development Framework (LDF), which is organised in a very different manner.
Rather than having one grand scheme the local planning office reviews each case independently, with a view to how it will improve the region and what benefits it will bring. - Meaning J30 can be viewed as case on it's own by planners, aside from former classification. On this basis i think objectors would have a very serious case finding fault, when you consider the amount of documentation and depth of study that has been put in by Yorkcourt and their team.

Interestingly parts of the UDP have ALREADY been removed and replaced- For me that already seriously undermines the key point of the WCCG's cause.
This method seems very progressive and forward thinking, which is strange when you consider it was produced by Boxy and his mates!!