Quote ="TURFEDOUT"Once again the RFL disciplinary confuse everyone.
They look at the incident and decide both players are to be charged and a what grade they should be charged.
Then this is the bit i just dont get:
LMS is charged with a grade B and Moore with a Grade A
The grading dictating punishment,so how the hell can the player charged with the offence with least applicable punishment end up being punished the most??
Both players have been sent off once in the last 3 years.
They RFL Disciplinary really do make themselves look very stupid.'"
Might be proportionate to there salaries... £300 in Moore's case might be 5% of his weekly income whereas LMS' £200 fine might make up 80% of his salary therefore punishing LMS more if you the jist