1. Crowd
6578 was not expecting that much, don't know if boy Sampson attracted anymore, difficult to tell how many Salford brought seemed quite a few behind the sticks as i walked round. On the other hand the size of our city we should be attracting more punters through the turnstiles especially with the start to the season we have had.Maybe its the cost to get in ?
2. Boy Sampson
Personally thought it was a complete waste of time and money spent on him, apart from all the kids round him could not see how it was of any benefit to anyone else in the ground. I had to ask my niece where he was, she pointed someone out in a green hooded top. This could have been anyone and there were kids at school with a bit of lino who were just as good.
3. Match
First half thought we controlled it without getting out of second gear. Second half thought we were very poor and their halfbacks ran the show. Very poor options on fourth and fifth tackle with forwards thinking they were playmakers.Certainly have to step up a few gears if we want to beat Warrington
The critic inside me aside with the players we have available before and then during the match it is a fantastic result and a brilliant start to the season.
Thought we did a good job in the first half and pretty much finished the game off. Then second half in true Trinity style tried to make it as tense and uncomfortable as possible. In the end a very solid and important win despite having a few out.
As to the pre match entertainment each to their own but even if you like that type of thing don't think the middle of a rugby pitch on a barely raised platform surrounded by kids is the best vantage point for such entertainment. However if brings folk through the turnstyles then fair enough.
all for motley crue at half time tho! Girls Girls Girls!!!
maybe we could borrow wigans cheerleaders?
smear posts with grease,
might boost gate by a few hundred!
and week after get noddy vs bob the builder russian roulette, one for the kiddies!
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.