One kind of leads to the other with regards to Haynesworth and the secondary, he isnt in there collapsing the pocket thus making it much more difficult for the opposing QB. The Bucs will be fine once they get Freeman in at QB and get Derrick Ward a few more carries. Some teams have decieving records by beating bad teams, the Packers and the Giants for example.

Well that's that for the Chargers. No way will we come back on the Bronco's now. They won't implode like they did last year. The only positive may be that Smith and Spanos may see sense and sack Norv in the off season. I'm sick of that idiot. I wouldn't mind seeing Russ Grimm coem in.

AJ, do not trade any of our picks away. Trade Merriman if you can get something worthwhile (e.g. a nose tackle / 1st rounder), but please keep next years picks in tact. We need help, big time.

Pretty pleased that Eddie Royal's TDs dont count on offense, as that's won me the fantasy game.

He didnt score me any points on offense though so I still lost



Did he really not have a catch or is the fantasy thing just fooked up?

I demand a recount



How can he have a Punt Return TD, a kick return TD but no receptions

It's still 96-78 to me.



Tank Tyler traded to Carolina.

I had 3 players with 0 points so I guess I should expect a loss

I've somehow topped my division now



Most competitive one in the league as well

I need to do a bit of juggling about this week as I have a few players on byes again, I think I may risk playing Michael Crabtree seeing as he has been promoted ahead of Josh Morgan on the 49ers roster



He cant do any worse than Nate Washingtons - 22 yards can he?

I dropped Washington last week! He looked poor even with my receivers.

I may be promoting Jonathan Stewart to my starting line up this week in place of the pathetic Matt Forte. Any interest in him? I would accept almost anything in terms of a trade!!

Haynesworth was vastly over-rated as it was.


I disagree about decieving records. The Giants have beaten the teams put infront of them, excpet the Saints, they are hardly in control of the schedule.

As for us, we hardly have a decieving record at 3-2. Frankly i'd have expected us to be 4-1. The Begals are alot better than many expected and Minnesotta away was always a defeat IMO.

It isn't like we have played Tampa, Cleveland, Buffalo, Kansas City, St.Louis and are 5-0. That would be decieving.

The Packers have beaten a shaky bears team, a bad St Louis team, and an awful Lions team, the 2 decent teams they have played they have lost against.

Well I held on to the win and I'm now 6-0. I have no idea how I'm pulling this off, I just must have been really lucky when drafting.

It isn't decieving though unless you expected us to be much worse or we had played completely terrible teams and won them all.

3-2 isn't a deceptive record in any way. I, along with other, expected us to go 4-1 at this point. How is going worse than that decieving?

You haven't beaten anybody of note.

Is that our fault? We've beaten teams and are rated about average in power rankings, rightly so. It isn't like we are being talked about as title contenders or anything.

[uHow is being 3-2 deceptive unless you expected us to go much worse? [/u

3-2 is average. That would only be decpetive if you expected us to be 5-0 or 0-5.

ANY DECENT TEAMS YOUVE PLAYED YOU'VE LOST AGAINST.YOU ONLY HAVE A WINNING RECORD BECAUSE YOU'VE BEATEN BAD TEAMS. Is that clearer? I read a few weeks pages back that you wouldnt give Denver credit as theyd beaten bad teams....capiche. By the way theyre 6-0 now.

=redPlus they have hardly beaten anybody worthwile

Cincy, they defeated on a complete fluke play.

Cleveland are atrocious. This years Detroit. I honestly think i could assmeble a team capable of beating them.

Oakland. Well Oakland are Oakland. Overall poor, especially on offence.

If they win the next three weeks and are 6-0 i'll re-asses my opinion.


There we go Mr Conroy, before engaging into arguments, try and think what youve said previously.

You clearly can't read. I've posted this two pages back.



I was wrong about the Broncos, they are a legitimate good team.

However you evidently don't know what deception means.



So if you'd actually answer the question. For us to have a decieving record of 3-2 that means you must think we should be either 5-0 or 0-5. [i[uSO ARE WE DECEPTIVELY GOOD OR DECEPTIVELY BAD?[/u[/i

We are hardly deceptive if we are the epitomy of middle of the road, ranked around sixteen in most power rankings, not far above 500. Again, does that mean you think we should be top or bottom?

We only lost by one TD to each team. I expect us to get to around 9 or 10 wins. Hardly 16-0 is it.

Anyone going on Sunday then?

and again, the point your arguing against you used yourself with the comment below, implying Denver's record is decieving as they hadnt played any good teams and saying youd wait till they were 6-0 till giving them credit...which is what im saying.

Plus they have hardly beaten anybody worthwile

Cincy, they defeated on a complete fluke play.

Cleveland are atrocious. This years Detroit. I honestly think i could assmeble a team capable of beating them.

Oakland. Well Oakland are Oakland. Overall poor, especially on offence.

If they win the next three weeks and are 6-0 i'll re-asses my opinion.

Moi. Travelling done early Sunday Morning, staying at the travel lodge Wembley. Hoping to check in, get in the Green Man for 10 - 11ish, where hopefully they'll show the Utd / Liverpool match.

IF YOU COULD ACTUALLY ANSWER AS OPPOSED TO QUOTING STUFF I'VE SAID. FOR US TO HAVE A DECIEVING RECORD YOU'D HAVE TO THINK WE'D EITHER BE EXCELLENT (5-0) OR TERRIBLE (0-5) TO BE ANYTHING LIKE DECIEVING. SO WHICH IS IT?

Average is not decieving unless you envisaged us being either excellent or terrible.


I'm fully aware of what i've said regarding Denver, you don't need to constantly quote it. They were 3-0 after beating average teams, they get credit for beating those teams they played. Simply i wasn't going to drastically re-think my opinion on them until they had played good teams. They have and i've said i was wrong. Not that they are deceiving.

Iv told you, ill take picture so it'll be like you were there