@ Mark Hughes.

It's still a sin he has Bryan Robson's shirt, but Allah I love Owen right now!

That's a joke. 4 minute injury time is 4 minute injury time. So what if Bellamy scored....if we're counting an extra minute for that goal and for subs there should have been 6 minutes on that alone plus injurys so 8 minutes on that theory...am sorry, but from a complete unbiased point of view, that was bollox.

City were robbed.

They scored before the 90th min 30 sec added for sub game should of ended around 94.30.

He scored on 89:55 seconds

Which aint the 90th min is it?

Why isn't it

What did he do?

Just his general face and reaction when Owen buried the winner. I'm not his biggest fan.

so what if city were robbed ?? who cares play to the whistle innit

Well theres no 90 in it for a start and another thing the board for 4 mins went up after he scored why didnt he change it to 5 if they was going to add time on?

WORD

Priceless







89 minutes are up so it goes into the 90th minute, clown!

I know it counts as 90 but it was scored in the 89 Cock.

He spends £300 billion and he still can't get them into the top 4. I could do that job he's done.

The closeness of the scoreline today powders over the cracks in the City warship. They were terrible. Defensively abysmal and in attack they would have come up with nothing were it not for so many glaring errors from United players. Credit to Bellamy though for a great strike with his first. His second was pathetic though, he over ran it but the keeper dived too far and left him an open goal.

The 97th minute winner said it all about City's performance. They could keep the ball if their lives depended on it and despite only having to deal with weak long balls they couldn't manage it and somehow despite having a defense costing £100m they could mark one of the most deadly finishers in the history of the Premier League.

Which is the 90th minute you fool

See above


Explain where 6 mins added time came from?

I think he's trying to say the goal was scored in regular time

The referee obviously signalled a MINIMUM of 4 which was portrayed to the 4th official. Once it's gone it can't be changed whether it's already displayed or not.

Bellamy scored with 5 seconds of normal time remaining, therefore his celebration ran into the alloted MINUMUM 4 minutes of added time. I'm not sure if Hughes made a substitution after the goal as well but if he did that time will also have been added on to the MINIMUM of 4 already displayed.

I think the point is the ref would have already told the 4th official how much added time he was going to allow but with that goal it would have changed.

That said he did play too much and City were unlucky in that respect.

Still I do not know why anyone needs to know how much time the ref is going to add on and it was better in the old days when you played to the whistle not count down the seconds after the board goes up.

Stinks of Fergie's magic clock.

Whistle for the foul on Rio went at 94:46
Free kick taken at 95:15
Owen score 95:28

Adding Bellamy's celebration which was a minute, maybe more, and the substitution of Carrick for Anderson that's easily another 1:30. The freekick was taken 95:15.

Thing is alot of the time refs don't add all the time on I have seen refs give a corner then blow for full time not letting them take it, the mancs always get that bit extra at OT when they need it an thats because Fergie is on at them with his watch all the time, if refs did this all the time most games would run till the 95th min they dont'.

Yeah but as ive already pointed out, there were 3 other goals with 90 second celebrations in the half which is 4.30 mins alone, them all the subs '30 secs' apparently is the rules....so why didnt the 4th official stick 7 mins on the board...you cant just pick and choose which goal celebration you can add minutes for can you?