read the thread, especially the ones from the poster i quoted.

was great tonight - seems a better prospect that mossop

Balls!

Does that mean he's unlikely to come back?

Hope they split up now...........theres plenty more fish in the sea and all that

really have to disagree, in a game where we can dominate against a poor pack he is a stand out player against a good team with our pack he is another luxuary.

Personally though Mossop was very good tonight.

think mf is fast on his feet, nimble, athletic and strong. we can bulk him up but he has skills we can't teach mossop.

mossop looks good dont get me wrong but i think mf could be something special.

Totally different players though tbh.

He's very similar to O'Loughlin imo and to fit both in at their prefared position of 13 is obviously impossible.

I'd like to have the chance though.

Sorry NK but it is true.

There is no scope to bulk him though, and he is not fast.

He is a 6 or a 13 a couple of years in Oz should see him hone his skills to 1 position probably 13.

I personally hope he never returns and makes a go of it with Wests.

Gutted.

His missus needs nobbling(please notice the 'L').

I reckon he can crack the first team at Wests though and that would be interesting to watch.

fast on his feet and fast arent the same thing jon. we bulked lockers big time one off season when he seemed relatively scrawny. mossop is a big strong lad. mf offers a bit more for mine.

id love to see him come back in a few years. think he could go well in oz.

Locky had the frame, Flanagan does not.

possibly yeah

i see more of a stephen wild type in mf. all round athlete. he has great hands for a back rower and think with specific training he could be a v good second row.

Why not use his good hands then? It would be a waste playing him at second row.

Loose forward at best i think, not got enough build to be a 2nd rower, certainly has the work ethic though.

He's just kind of stuck between a centre, a 6 and a 13 for me, not quite got the pace or build to be defined to a single one.

maybe the oz conditioners will work there magic somehow.

In a good team he could be special, in our team sadly not.

He could be our Wilkin but not without Props.

I agree with the Wilkin comparison, think he has the potential to go to Oz and come back a much better player than Wilkin though, hopefully.

Why would they need to?

He's not tiny to start with and more then holds his own in defence and attack.

He looks a natural born 13 which is always going to be a hard position to crack here anytime soon.

If he goes to Wests and cracks the first team then good on him. I think he stands a good chance.

He has a far superior work ethic.

Hope he stays out there though myself.

He has all the basic skills the Aussie will love.

I think he'll make a real go of it there and wouldn't be suprised to see him in an England jersey in a few years.

He lacks impact and often loses the collision, he needs to bulk or drop to a 6.

He has great skills and potential but he needs a dominant pack if he is to be a part of it.

You sound like Brian Noble.

www.skysports.com/story/0,19528, ... 28,00.html Signed for Wests Tigers apparently.

www.skysports.com/story/0,19528, ... 28,00.html Signed for Wests Tigers apparently.

Interesting... I don't think anything has been officially announced, but it wouldn't suprise me if Tim Sheens brought him over.

heard he had signed for wests on friday from someone at the club

see my post on page six.