as opposed to the system that failed to beat hull,leeds,cas,hudders

Yes but that one that beat Quins. Bratfut and Salford

So would you say our system atm is working???

We gotta change it up

Lockers to SO is gonna solve everything though yeah

What will then? Sorry for suggesting something different

Wats yur team then?

Nothing will be solved over night

It's not really something different either as it has already been tried and subsequently failed

My team?..

Richards
Roberts
Bailey
Carmont
Ainscough
Sam
Tommy
Prescott
Riddell
Coley
Hansen
Hock
Lockers

Feka
Joel
Fielden
McIlorum

Why? because it's our best available 17 at the moment, IMO anyway

So the team that lost against Huddersfield is gunna be saints

Really don't get what your point is tbh

That team is our best 17 IMO and yes they lost against Huddersfield doesn't mean there going to lose against Saints. If they play to there capability they have a pretty good chance IMO

If you wana play that game as well, so the team that lost to Wakey(worse than Huddersfield btw) is gonna beat Saints?

Yes there are problems but putting Lockers to SO isn't going to solve them, its going to take a LOT more than that

If your gunna get sarcy about my team and dismiss it cos we tried it once and it didnt work i will about yours

Not being sarcy

I notice how you chose not to respond to the rest of my post

id go for..

Richards
Ainscough
Carmont
Pryce
Roberts
S.Tomkins
LeuLeuia
Fielden
Riddell
O'Carroll
Hock
Tomkins
O'loughlin

Mcllorum
Prescott
Paleaaesina
Coley

It's tough enough playing Saints with 17 nevermind 13



Eamon and Phelps are injured as well

Still don't get what your point is and you still haven't responded to the rest of that post

my bad

So you werent being sarcy??? answer that

For the bit you originally quoted no
For the Lockers to SO bit yes

Do i get a response now? Or are you goin to try and tiptoe around it again?

You could say the same for my team, just cause they lost to wakey doesnt me they would lose to saints. And you started "that game" (in bold) by saying the system that lost to wakey then.

Lockers going 6 would improve our defence on the fringes and he has shown good passing ability. A weakness of Lockers at 6 is obviously his kicking game but lets face it could our kicking game get any worse than it is at the minute.

It also allow Lealuai to move to 9, his best position right? Bit harsh on Macca but I think when Lealuai moves to 9 he becomes our best attacking threat(we havent got many). Give him a quick PTB and he can make a break out of nowhere.

Thats the reasoning for my team

Lockers isn't a 6 nor even a 13 IMO

I think our best combination in the halves is Sam and Tommy so to change that in the middle of a game is not a good idea either especially when we are weakening the halves.

Defence would improve yes but Sam has shown he is more than capable of coping (he wouldn't be in the team if he wasn't) and it will be a good learning curve for him

Tommy's best position is 9 yes but he is also our best 7 and I think Riddell and McIlorum are more than capable of covering the hooking role to a decent enough standard.

You say Tommy's main threat is off a quick PTB, there's nothing stopping him from jumping in at DH if he see's the oppurtunity and he is never too far away from the ruck either.

I would love to see him do that more, hope he does

Depends what sort of instructions Noble gives him

Not much chance of him saying anything constructive

i started the thread,read a lot of replies,still think mine is the best team

Dont rule that out

i mean, would that really shock us

In my opinion

Richards
Roberts
Bailey/Gleeson (If he does actually come)
Carmont
Ainscough
S. Tomkins
Leuluai
Prescott
Riddell
Coley
Hansen
O'Loughlin
J. Tomkins

Feka
Hock
McIlorum
Mossop