LMAO

So now you've just proven my point that you are a pathetic tool by offering a face to face meeting over a disagreement on a forum







For your information pal, I don't need the monitor to 'protect' me I'm quite capable of airing my views whether that be face to face or behind a monitor.

If I'm on a high horse you sir are sitting on a mountain horse!

Your a pathetic, laughable, childish tool.

You turned this into an personal argument. Not me.

"pr1ck"
"b@st@rd"
"N0bhead"

are just 3 names you've labelled me. I'm not crying about it - to be frank I couldn't give a monkeys what you or anyone else thinks about myself. You don't matter to me nor will you ever matter to me.

I tried once to get back on topic - but to no avail. Now, can finally we get back on topic or are you going to carry this on?

seriously, who cares.

If you guys still want to have this petty argument start pm'ing each other and keep if off the RUMOURS THREAD!

No-one wants to read about you two just arguing.

I did suggest that and I have attempted to get back on topic twice.

Okay, here's a solution.

[size=200ANYONE GOT ANY INTERESTING RUMOURS????[/size

Ridiculous that it's got this far. Pack it in or there'll be bans issued out. Too many times recently this forum has turned into petty squabbles and it's a pain in the backside clearing it all up.

Idris


cuz I made it up

personally, on the topic of the brough rumour, although i rate brough as a player i dont feel that he has the qualities that we are looking for.
I would much rather either keep tomkins and leuluai as our 6/7 as they are showing at the moment that they can do the job or i would like us to sign a organising gamebreaker who knows his way around the field. However i would only want us to sign him if the hookers could be organised so that mccillorum could get some game time.

Jesus god no!!! don't ban me, what would I possibly do with my time???? What a waste of time this thing is!

D1cks like 100% warrior who daren't be argued with! how dare I possibly have a different opinion than him and how dare I post bull on this forum that can't possibly be true because I don't have 7000000 posts to my name and a name like "biggest rugby fan" or "ultimate warrior" What a load of Sh1te.

Somebody post a rumour or an opinion, they are called thick and "not the sharpest tool in the box" and then you defend them and you are the aggresive one, no absolutely not, I am just here to discuss anything to do with rugby unlike some who are just here to say I no more than you and you cannot possibly be right, now if you dare to have a difference of opinion than me again all my forum buddies will tell you to calm down and then I will preach about how I "tried my best to get on with the discussion" aye alreet mate you really are a model individual!


Ban me, like a give a flying fook, this place is sometimes handy for finding the occasional bit of info out and I don't doubt that some are decent people, but I shan't be wasting my time attempting to discuss something I have seen or know anymore as it falls on deaf ignorant ears on here. One thing I will do though is defend someone when it is clear that all they are doing is genuinely trying to contribute to a "forum" and get shot down by know all uber fans!! you know who you are.


That is unless I am banned for daring to have a go back!

Why the hell do people take it this seriously

People take it this seriously because it is damn frustrating when you post on these forums and just get shot down! On about 3 occasions I have posted stuff on these forums, things that I have been told, or heard and they have instantly been shot down, on this particular occasion I posted in defense of somebody that I too had seen what they had seen and found it very odd. Despite what anybody else says and even though nobody has suggested just because he was there that he has "signed" it is not normal for a current wakefield player to turn up at a wigan reserve game with a member of the wakey staff, watch 20 mins of the game, then spend 20 mins chatting to noble in private then leave!


Like I have said before it is a rugby forum and this thread in particular is called rumour and signings. You should be able to come on here post something that you have seen or heard and not expect to be called thick and "not the sharpest tool in the box" or "let me know how youre exam results go"

how condescending can you get?


I'm sure many will agree with me that the majority of the time you cannot post on here without being subject to belittlement and name calling, Yes of course I have called people but certainly not before they have tried their best to offend or belittle me, I'm a 29 yr old man and my 3 yr old daughter talks to me better then some on here.


Believe me its not about me being petty or aggresive, one or two on here know me and will agree in person I am just a normal decent bloke and can have a perfectly normal chat about rugby. I just feel on here that people find it too easy to say the stuff they do behind the safety of a monitor and I am not saying for one second I am not the same but if I was spoken to like I have been on here then I would damn sure say the stuff I have said on here I'm just not sure that the conversations would start the same way in person. I don't think people would be shot down the same.

Bloody 'ell Mathers

Perfect Timeing

Excellent post

there is a bit of an elitist attitude with some posters on here

Let's draw a line under it now then.

So, back on topic.........

Whats an LMS?

Hope the rumours of Brough are true, not rated by many but I personally think he would be an ideal signing. What is the rumour doing the rounds? Has he been seen at the club ?

London Mathematical Society?

Surely theres rules against playing a large group as 1 player.

He went to watch his mate play in the reserves at Orrell and as such must be signing.

Leddy Maytum Stacy Architects is a San Francisco based firm that provides high performance architecture to institutional, commercial and residential clientele

Not a clue if theres any truth in it but i'm another who wouldn't mind there being.

Aslong as we got the prop(or 2) we need in first and theres room under the cap for him i think he'd be a cracking signing.

I like Brough but I'm not sure why we're looking at a halfback unless we're getting rid of a hooker. How long is MM contract?

Riddell going?

I suppose that's a rumour but I'd imagine there would be something more concrete out in the open if that was the case. Surely we'd have heard about interest from Aussie clubs regarding it.

He's got at least a year left i think.

Maybe the club just wants some back up for the halfback positions. Instead of having to shift Phelps of Gleeson into the halves they would have a ready made replacment.

I don't think Brough would be the man to miss out on a place in the 17 though if he did sign...............more likely to be McIlorum which would be a shame.