Yeah, because he's the spokesman for all of us. Div!

Agreed. That was one idiot. But he is the sort of idiot who taints those around him. Best to get shut of him.

1. Your're assuming Leeds won't reach the grand final when infact they have contested 6 of the last 8 finals.

2. Danny won't care one ounce what any of you malicious pie eaters think.

3. He will be too busy organising his testimonial (awarded to him for his class and loyalty)during the off season to take a holiday.

That's a chomp if ever I saw one.

I wonder if his 'class and loyalty' will assist his club to reduce their number of league losses (down from 11) next season.

Find this now rather funny.

Some think the game hinges on if he gets his ban lifted on appeal. That will make little difference if we play as we did against Leeds in the CC semi final we played the worst performance in 3 years that day. we repeat that and if they have Stevie Wonder at 6 they will still win. But if we turn up and play as we did until TL injury at the Exiles game then we will win fairly comfortable.
game.
But listening to some posts by some Warriors fans nad loads of Rhinos it seems that the lose of Maguire will decide the game.

Mcguire decided not to appeal

I blame Wane and Tomkins.

No Appeal - Good

KEEP CALM
&
CARRY ON

You mean the Ape and Ratboy?

Available from all good comic bookstores.

You will always want one of your oppositions best players to be banned or injured,if it gives your own team a better chance of winning. Did wane and Tomkins say what they did before Brian Mac's comments or after. Does anyone really care or is it just banter.

1. What in the world does Leeds reaching 6 of the last 8 finals have to do with whether they will get to this one? Dear oh dear

2. Oh really? I thought he based his decisions solely upon my views

3. He won't lift a finger to organise it you dope!

Not really, he's just an average 6, decent support runner when Ryan Bailey decides to make a marauding run once every 5 years

I'm more concerned we have our first choice 6/7 firing and ready to go because if they control the match like we know they can do, we win

Where did I say he spoke for all of you?..so you start calling me a Div very classy. by the way when I posted that there were only about six posts on there.. two of them wanting the team to start something if you were loosing.

I'll be honest, I'm surprised he got a ban even if it was a lenient one.

www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/sport/ru ... -1-4961766 Can't believe Hetherington can defend that tackle. Going for the ball! Don't make me laugh.

www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/sport/ru ... -1-4961766 Can't believe Hetherington can defend that tackle. Going for the ball! Don't make me laugh.

I've got to admit the 1 comment so far on the link brought a slight smile to my face.

Hetherington said “Reckless implies it was deliberate and it’s not"

Absolute nonsense. A tackle can be wreckless regardless of your intention.

In fairness to Gary, it was partly the catalan players fault, after all if he didnt have a head it would have been a perfectly legitimate swinging arm with a flat hand at the ball!

as opposed to coming in second man in a tackle with a swinging arm aimed at the head...........

McD bitching about SW

[urlhttp://www1.skysports.com/rugby-league/news/12211/8111748/[/url

What a silly comment from Hetherington. Being reckless means you know there is a risk of hitting the head but you carry on regardless. The fact that he doesn't appear to know the difference between that state of mind and a deliberate action says it all really.

Hilarious stuff

"Maggsy"

Me too !

That's us into the Grand Final then!



How Leeds can even defend what McGuire did is a joke. We are going to take it to Leeds now and I fear for them. Only thing playing into their hands at the moment is the weather.