They can, but it is incredibly tough.

Week 1:

3 beat 2
5 beat 4

Week 2:

3 beat 1 and advance to Grand Final
5 beat 2

Week 3:

5 beat 1 and advance to Grand Final


They CAN meet, but would have to have beaten EVERYONE above them.

Yeah isn't it just...I only hope its finished before about noon on Saturday as i will be having a couple of beers in manchester prior to watching the super saints in the grand final at old trafford! Still, gives warrington and wigan fans something to extend their season....

Do you seriously think it doesn't make much difference finishing 5th compared to 1st or 2nd? Do you now think that the 5th placed team will regularly make the GF?

1st & 2nd place hold all the trump cards. 2 home games against lower ranked opposition and the GF awaits. A champion team would be able to negotiate this.

Trouble is the teams finishing below 1st or 2nd in the playoffs could of been taking it easy all season and are actually better than the top 2. Look at Leeds playoff run compared to Saints or Wigans. Leeds beat Hull and Hudds who were both pap then won one tough match vs Wire, Saints had to beat us twice in two very tough matches yet they finished above Leeds.

We didn't have to beat you twice. We did, but we didn't have to.

One loss for Leeds and they were out.

You can't be overly critical of a team who picks & chooses when they want to perform. By the same token (in the example of Hudds) if a team loses form at the end of the season, you cannot use that an excuse for the other team winning - they were 4th on merit and should have given us that 'tough' match that you seem to think we deserved. Nobody complained when Wigan made easy meat of Catalan.

It always has been (and always will be) much easier to qualify for OT from 1st or 2nd place - that is why it usually happens. Finishing 5th gives no second bite of the cherry, with all the difficult matches away from home

To be fair its never happened before so the way the fixtures may of panned out could just be a freak. If it happens on a regular basis though do we not think the regular season games are virtually gonna become friendlies? I think top should be champions but obviously for the good of the game we have to keep the playoffs. I just think that the top team should have a bit more reward to keep the regular season race for top spot healthy.

Leeds and Saints both deserve to be at OT as they have played superbly through the play offs, in no way am i disputing that. We all know the system before we start.

I'm fairly sure under the old top system 1v2 in the first week with the winning going straight to the GF (with a week off) so a 3v5 GF was impossible.

It was a far superior system.

One got the week off and the top 3 got a second go.

That was the top 6 system. 1 v 2 got the first week off, played 2nd week with the winner getting another week off.

Correct

Officially?

I can OFFICIALLY ANNOUNCE that that is correct

Thank god for that, an announcement at last.

Does that make Conroy official?






BOOOOOOOOOOO

I'm clearly easily confused. Ah well. Still a better system mind

I'd like to see the playoffs become sudden death personally.

1st v 8th
2nd v 7th
3rd v 6th
4th v 5th

Highest seed always get the home game until we get down to the last 2. You win the league your reward is you get home advantage for the playoffs. Simples. Club call needs binning. It's ridiculous as it is. Leeds met Wigan twice last year in the playoffs while Saints met Wigan twice this time round. Complete farce having the same game twice in a playoff format.

Thats the same as the old Premiership play-offs before the GF play-offs were introduced. It does have merits i.e. all sudden death and the highest placed teams getting home advantage. I think the current system of the top two losing home advantage is crazy. The benefit of finishing in the top two is now diminished.

However, I still prefer the top 5 system. Even though the first game between 1st and 2nd wasn't sudden death it still really mattered because the winner went straight through to the GF. The rest of the games were sudden death and so all games were competitive. If anything I think the game between 1st and 2nd was the best of the play-off games because both went for the win big style but knowing that they still had a safety net. A couple of the games between Leeds and Saints at Knowsley Road were fantastic to watch i.e. great rugby and competitive.

The benefit of being able to lose a playoff game then having another shot is pretty big in my opinion. You are rewarded for finishing top 2.

I'd like to see a bigger reward for being the League Leaders. Whether this is in the form of an automatic place in the final I'm not sure, but I do think we need to reward this achievement properly.

No, you can finish top 4 and get that reward. The only reward top 2 get is home advantage in the first game (and club call if your top). Hardly the greatest reward for a season of being the best team.

1v8, 2v7, etc has merit, but I would prefer to see 1v2 then 3v8, 4v7, 5v6 with the winner of 1v2 getting the easier route/straight to GF.

Definatley. We need to make the top spot more sought after to keep the regular season healthy imo. Seeing teams celebrate after just scraping into the top 8 is laughable and needs to be changed as well imo.

It's embarassing that teams who finish in the bottom half of the table qualify for the playoffs imo. I don't know whether the playoffs are a good idea, we have them so that's irrelevant. But I do know that they shouldn't reward mediocrity and shouldn't devalue the league which takes place throughout the year, currently they do both imo.

Think thats a load of crap frankly.



The top 8 spaces were keenly contested this year with Cas Hull Hull KR etc all fighting desperatley for the last 3 places.

The Championship is in 2 phases...the league to sort the places (not the title) and then the play offs to decide the Champions.