Why did you not reply to my post that quoted yours?
You know the one where you dismissed thebehole of Kamal Harris career, and insinuate that she only got the job because shes a Black Woman

You have some pretty awful views IMO

You then say if someone has different views to mine I seem them as racist.

Well here goes, put up or shut up, find me one, just one single post where I have called any individual racist.
Your the one shooting his mouth off, slinging mud

Your the one insinuating that theres some kind of inverted racism, sexism going on and people only getting jobs because of their gender or skin colour.

They didnt select her before (insert any kind of word relating to your knowledge on the subject) because hebinky formally won the democratic party nomination June AFTER the George floyd incident.
And they announce Kamala Harris around the same time as every other Republican or democratic leader has, end of June through to mid August.
Have you been watching Fox News by any chance, one of Tucker Carlsons brigade.

Correct

We should be debating whether Jackson Hastings will stay or go at seasons end, we should be debating whether we got our moneys worth out of Fielden, we should be debating whether or not someone looks like Phil Bailey, we should not be debating this because it is politics and it shouldn't mix with sport, the club should have stayed out of it.

We are, on other threads.
Just because you dont like something or feel something shouldnt be done doesnt mean everyone else does

If you don’t like the topic, don’t comment? Simple concept.

Please educate yourself. VP nominations are made in the most part prior to the nomination conventions, which for the Democrats are imminent. I wonder if you were so ‘triggered’ when Trump picked Pence days before the Republican nomination convention in 2016? You have conveniently overlooked the post about her achievements. Picking and choosing which to reply to to suit an agenda? Typical right.

If you don't like politics and sport mixing then Rugby League probably isn't the sport for you - it was founded as essentially a working class uprising and has been in many ways a social movement ever since.

But even putting that to one side, continually saying Black Lives Matter is "politics" or "political" is pretty mind-boggling to me - it's is all one big distraction by people who, whether they admit it to themselves or not, either don't really seek change or don't really see a problem.

I don't recall anything to support the miners in the early 90's, nor do I remember the club supporting New Labour in 97, I don't recall the club being against the Iraq war nor the Afghanistan war, I don't recall the club having a view on the bankers causing the great recession or on global warming.

So why now?

Who's put a penny in you?

If you look back you'll see I've posted quite a bit.

It is a forum you know, I don’t need a “penny” put in to make a comment.

You do realise a major point on that election was that a lot of us lefties wanted better funding for the NHS?

Ignore him mate ignorance knows no bounds,he just puts provocative posts on here all the time,obviously a very sad little person

its never been as well funded, keeping away from the other stuff

While those on the right wanted less immigration and that Oven Ready deal

And its "Lefties" who been pointing out the social inequalities of Austerity on those less vulnerable in society over the first 10 years of Tory rule.
On the other hand it doesnt seem so bad when you consider were weve gone and where were going in the last 10minths.

I don't want to get sidetracked, just thought it was a bizarre point to make when it's something the left (me included) have clearly been very vocal about

You're boycotting the club so it doesn't matter whether we do or we don't.

Unless the other 16 players leave too and then you'll come back.

Correct. Give it 3 years, see you then.

The funny thing with this is I was brought up to believe Labour is the party for the working class when they are totally against them no matter their intentions.

For instance being pro EU immigration, surplus labour supply drives down wages for the low skilled/ lower paid jobs.

An increase in minimum wage to £10 an hour, everyone at the bottom gets a pay rise but then prices go up to pay for the food pickers, shelf stackers, delivery drivers, etc, etc and prices go up to pay for this, so the people on minimum wage see no difference, the only people who see a difference are those on slightly above minimum wage who in turn get a pay cut due to the increase in prices. Bizarre to think they are on the side of the people. It took me until recently to figure it out despite being Labour all my life, they are not on your side.

This thread is like a really edition of "Question Time".

to be fair I dont think anyone has ever asked for it to be less funded

Be less funded if its private, but this isn't a thread for politics

True but don’t remember anyone asking for it to be privatised

Correct, as proved at the last general election when many traditional and more wiser Labour voters helped the Tories win by a landslide because they did not want the country run by a bunch of left wing idiots led by Corbyn, Abbott, McDonald, Thornberry etc and also realised that the party is no longer the party for WORKING people.

Judging by some of the more recent comments, it look like there is a few who did!

RLPOLITICS.COM

On a lighter note. When do the latics officially cease to exist

First day of the new season if no buyer comes forward.