Well what makes then think he'd be a good captain? Being sin binned for back chat? Giving away silly penalties? Oh, I know - it's because he's the new golden boy.

The guys got a little bit of an attitude about him but any good halfbacks needs that, as for giving away silly penalties do you think O'Loughlin would be anywhere near the captain's role if we judged people on that. If you want my opinion on why I might consider Sam as captain it's down to the fact he's constantly talking and organizing those around him, as well as doing good things on the field that others can follow.

We need someone the rest of the squad respect; someone with experience and a cool head in frantic situations. I'd say Richards or Carmont.

The most important thing is the whole squad perform as a team, cutting out all the errors and penaties. If we can do this it doesn't matter who the captain is.

Yes and doing a good job, so lets leave him alone and not give him too much responsibility.

At the moment though - if Sam took a dump in the middle of the field there would be some d1ck on here who would say it was the greatest dump ever blah blah blah

Richards

Only if it was steaming

Yes he is doing a good job but then again you wouldn't give the role to someone is crap would you? As for responability some players when it's placed on there shoulders either sink or swim, I get the feeling Sam would do the latter, talking about it though is irrelevant because he wont be given it, but do I think he could handle it and do a good job yes.

With a username like that I'm not suprised at your suggestion

Why won't Tommy (who has been captain before) be captain?

It won't be Sam, so we better think of someone else. HH?

Only one for me Tommy Leuleui is head and shoulders above the rest!

Agree with that.

He seems very focussed in the interview on't website and he's our best player at the moment

Care to elaborate?

TL or Carmont.

I already have pal

Consistency and some sort of a presence are the keys for me.

Carmont or Gleeson.

Pat Richards, I personally think he has been playing more confident (apart from his kicking)a solid player give him a chance see what he can do.

Too much responsibility? That doesn't wash.

Sam has played more games as captain than anybody else in tomorrow's squad. He has shown (so far) that he is up to SL level and is used to captaining the team he's in, so why not give him a shot?

If you're good enough, you're old enough.

Sam playing for the reserves tomorrow then??



Sam has absolutly not captianed Wigan's first team squad more than anybody else. That's spin on 'The Sun' level!

I would rather see Tommy given another shot than Sam, he's going well as he is, so why change anything. Richards for me won't do much talking, and it's gona take some serious leadership from the wing. Carmont, similar, althought he does always put his hand up, so maybe.

Hoesntly I think Fielden or Tommy are the only candidates for me, Fielden was trememndous when we gave him Captaincy last year, maybe a coincidence due to the world cup?

Tommy.

Where did I say that? You should be an MP.

I said that Sam is experienced as a captain, I didn't mention Superleague.

i agree Sam should not be captain. IMO it will be Tommy

And when the boat is rocking and possibly sinking against the Champions will the team look to Sam and hope his experience will hold the team together and guide them through a tough spell?



Please have Tomkins as captain.

Leuluai or Gleeson for me.

And Just how old was Sinfield when he became Leeds Captain Or Faz when he became GB captain.

Well Sinfield was 20 when he was captain of Leeds And Faz Captained GB at 21.

Sam is a natural Leader just as Sinfield is and Faz was as they say in this day and age he can talk the talk and walk the walk. He can organize a side and i think it would bring out the best in him give him a shot thats what i say its a 50/50 game and his energy and commitment might just transfer to other players and win us the match