Tomorrows game is a definite '4 Pointer' to be 4 points clear at this stage of the season, having already played Leeds, Saints & Wire is epic. Going to be hard because they will want to put right the tonking they got last week by the Wire. Be on your game tomorrow boys!

wash your mouth out and say 10 hail mary's and keep your fingers crossed

Massive game tomorrow.

I'm actually *MUCH* more relaxed about tomorrow now.

In the words of the advert - What's the worst that can happen?

We could lose and STILL be 2 points clear at the top.

However - We need to get the players to relax now, and just let them enjoy the game.
When they do that, they are unstoppable.

It's round 14, so we've played EVERYONE

If we play with the same fight we did against them at Murrayfeild, we'll most like walk it. Nice to see us back where we belong.

On another note, I am no relation to a certain Stain, but he's not scouse.

None of them are. (James Graham excluded...

I really hate the benefit of the doubt rule. If you can't tell from 5 different angles then you can't give it in my opinion.

Think it evened up the Eastmond 'no try' though that I think was a try.

We know we know, but it dont half wind em up!!!

but what about Pryces knock on that led to a try....so not even really.

That was a colossal own goal Steven!



Having said that the RFL should never put him or any other official in that position as any controversial decision is always going to result in this sort of reaction from the rest of us.

But it must be obvious if even Steady and Heave-o are calling the decision ridiculous.

It was just so clear - The ball quite clearly hits the top of the knee, then the players arms move upward and the next sight of the ball is on top of the player.

Now unless someone changed either the properties of the ball, allowing it to elongate when squeezed like a stress-ball, or the laws of physics, then there is no way that it got within coo-ee of the turf.

To quote a certain Jim - "Benefit of the doubt...... My ärse."

We need to treat tomorrow as though itrs a cup final. Lets also not forget about the comments made after we beat them 2 weeks ago. Lets go and show them what an enforcer really is like

I know too. But it don't half wind us up as well

We can't join in with half the songs at KR

Difficult to call Ganson a cheat when he could have awarded the Eastmond try with nary a raised eyebrow.

In terms of the Moore 'try', my understanding of the benefit of the doubt rule is that unless the video shows a try [inot[/i being scored, it should be awarded. There was a second just as Moore crossed the line, with the ball close to the ground, where vision was obscured. It's possible it was grounded (although I don't believe it was).

Ganson probably made the correct call in respect of the ruling, however I accept that this interpretation hasn't been consistently applied.

Made no real difference though, we were sufficiently awful to give you mob a Saturday night boost!

....and some Wigan fans have been calling Warrington arrogant?

funny how u all moan about that try but its amazing that none of u have mentioned the eastmond try 10mins earlier that wasnt given for "obstruction". but i guess u pie eaters just see what u want through those cherry and white glasses. ha. well done salford by the way, worthy winners.

Errrrrrrrrrrrrr see a few posts above yours!!

a knock on off pryce and held up from moore, you could have had the eatmind try and still come out lucky

Sure I mentioned it somewhere

I agree it is stupid that refs are now allowed to officiate in their home town's games each week if appointed to do so. I could understand them changing the rules in respect of cup finals as we used to have the situation where the (considered to be) best refs were often unable to officiate the big games like the Challenge Cup Final because the team from their home town dominated and usually reached them and in such important games you need the best official in charge.

In respect of finals I can see a need to have the best available ref regardless of where he is from but for ordinary league games there is no need to put a St Helens ref in Saints' game, or a Warrington ref in Warrington's game. We have enough referees to be able to avoid doing so for run of the mill games. Referees get enough stick without the authorities giving people more motives for criticising every decision.

Didn't watch the game, but the result makes our game tommorow a very big opportunity. We should definitely be aiming to finish top now, and although there will still be plenty of time for us to be toppled, going 4 points clear over half way through the season would be a very good position to be in.

were in a great possition at the half way mark. hope we can do a job on shuddersfield today. As for the eastmond try . how the knock on from pryce was not spotted i will never know

How good was it to see Fozzard get done for leading with the arm FINALLY. It probably cost them the game aswell because up to that point the game was swinging in Saints favour then they scored after that penalty

Well done Terry Albert

The Eastmond "No Try" was obstruction and was the correct decision
[url=http://img130.imageshack.us/i/ruled.jpg/[/url
Page 39 Laws of the Game - Section 15 Player Misconduct - Notes

Funny caller on GMR about him then