I'm just shocked he is still at the club

I wouldn't use him has a scapegoat if pat or sam had a shocker i'd post it here

And he scored, and stopped at least 1 pretty much nailed on try from a 4 on 2 hudds overlap.

Give it a fecking rest.

Thanks also for demonstrating you don't understand how the salary cap works or balancing a team salary.

Except he didn't have a shocker, and you're posting here.......

He ran a try in big wow

Take you cherry and white specs off

Take your 'Karl Pryce can do no right' specs off

He didn't have a shocker though, he made 1 error from that play the ball near the start. Other times he defused the ball which in no way anyone else would have been able to get out of and he helped the forwards out from the back to have a breather when in our own half. I fail to see how he had a shocker, not saying he had a mom performance but he's done well enough to keep his spot for the Widnes game. Who knows a good a run of games we might see a big difference, because that was only his 8th game for us yesterday in the time he's been here and other times when he's played he's been played at centre or at stand off.

Lol the fact is many on here don’t like ‘fans’ making up bull e reasons to bag a player who did very little wrong yesterday just because they have an agenda against him.

Pryce was solid if unspectacular yesterday why can’t you just admit it? How can that be called a shocker i really don't know?

Instead you talk cr@p but don’t tell the full story of the game. His first touch was indeed a fumble but he also re-gathered the ball and thwarted two Hudds defenders attempts to shove him over the try line. He made a mistake but made up for it i'd callt that even. Funny how you miss that part out isn’t it?

I like the way you say he could have run over Brough if he wanted but yet if Sam Tomkins would have made that tackle many on here would be praising Sam’s technique of going low on the big guy and wrapping his legs up well. Brough’s tackle would have brought down any player as it was perfectly timed with excellent technique.

But don’t let what really happened get in the way of your agenda.

When he picked the ball up he got hit like 5 yards away from the line

Ok guys answer a question 'would pryce make it into the squad if everyone was fit?'

Time will tell if he does turn his form around i will happly eat humble pie

No, Darrel Goulding might not make it into the squad if everyone was fit, and he's been outstanding. Answer this question, did Pryce do enough wrong yesterday to warrent a 9 page thread about how terrible he is and how enthusiastic he looks.

Personally yes, I'd like to see this backline at full strength:

1. Roberts
2. Pryce
3. Gleeson
4. Carmont
5. Pat

Plenty of size, power and speed. Would be very dangerous in the oppositions 20 zone.

As good as a clubman Phelps has been for us, I don't see him in a position where he can settle in at, especially when the best fullback at the club is Roberts.

No he didn't but 8 games in 2 1/2 years does

Imo atm goulding would make it in with a fully fit squad

Like in my last post i'd have goulding over him anytime

Will that be in the apology thread after the apology thread about Roberts and Riddell?

Any chance we can have this thread locked mods? it's rapidly going nowhere.

He was five yards away from the line with no momentum and had just been hit by two defenders who had all the momentum behind them. He did very well not to be shoved back.

No he wouldn't get in the starting squad but i can't see what that has to do with anything? Is he a better winger than Roberts or Richards? No he isn't but neither is Ryan Hall, Scott Donald, Matt King, Fox, Gardner, Goulding and a lot of players in the NRL as well etc etc.

Are they all bad players now? What exactly is your point?

And again what actually did Pryce do so wrong yesterday that you can label his performance as a shocker?

We aint got a fb atm so pat or amos will be there

Riddell?

There are threads on here what i dont agree with but i dont spit my dummy out at what people have wrote dont like it dont post simple

Apart from Phelps i agree

Not sure if i'm right but did madge drop him yesterday?

I still think he's not 100% you cant lose form just like that

But if he's 100% which is what you asked in your OP then he'd be in the team?

I don't think he would to be honest, Phelps for me offers a bit more in attack from fullback and I prefere seeing Richards and Roberts on the wing, so I wouldn't want to drop Phelps because one of them would then have to drop off the wings, don't get me wrong, thats a tough call to make, but I think Richards and Roberts offer more on the wings than Goulding does, but thats a whole different kettle of fish.

Right, so he wasn't even fit for a year of it, so he's been available for one and a half years. He's had a few starts and hasn't done that well so he's been spending time in the reserves trying to get some confidence back, then he gets back in the first team and does an OK job, that performance last night didn't warrent the criticism he's getting here.

If we go off current form no i'd have amos at fb and pat/goulding on the wings

Agreed, some on here would have bagged Greg Inglis and never given him a chance (and before they all go mental, if you know ANYTHING about Inglis you'll know he's often quiet and looks off the pace early season). Is Karl Greg? of course not, but lets just give a guy who did nothing wrong a chance.

The club when we signed him was part at fault, no it doesn't the fact he's still at the club is mind boggling

Being a pro sports player is tough players come and go pryce has not shown anything to warrent a new contract imo

Thing is how many chances do you want to give him?

If he's done a good job in the academy why is he not showing improvment for the first team?