I had no idea that you had to pay to post an opinion on here. Is this a new thing that has come in, or is it just on this board?

Well if he is or isn't playing, I still think you will have enough to win, and I can't believe I'm about to say this but I hope you do win. I can't be bothered with yet another GF with Leeds in it, unless we play them. I'd rather play you guys in the big one should we also get there.

It just wouldn't make any sense as mind games. Chances are nobody in the Leeds camp is even aware of the rumours and if they are it's not like it's going to make any impact whatsoever.

The game needs a Wigan v Wire final to bring back some credibility to the sport. First versus second and the only two teams who have shown consistency in the league for the last three years.

It would be a fantastic spectacle to close the league season.

You said it was mind games despite most posters saying he was not playing. If you are so certain would you like to bet on it or are you just trolling?

Just out of interest........


[uSeasons 2010 - 2012[/u

Of 81 league matches played in total:

=#800000Wigan - Won 63, Drawn 3, Lost 15
=#4000FFWire - Won 62, Drawn 1, Lost 18
Saints - Won 54, Drawn 5, Lost 22
Leeds - Won 48, Drawn 2, Lost 31

Regardless of what happens tonight the play off system needs changing.

That statistic shows how flawed it is atm.

Why? Everyone knows the score at the beginning of the season - you get naff all for winning the most league games. Who is to say that Leeds (and especially Wire considering their rotation policy) would lose as many if that stipulation was to be changed?

It's impossible to judge. Leeds peak at the right time every year, sadly they know that this is all that modern teams need to do. Every team should know this.


On the Tomkins issue, I'd be very surprised if he isn't playing, it would have to be serious.

Yes they do , everyone is bound by confidentiality rules...dismissal is usually the consequence of breaching patient confidentiality to the public

So because a few people have said he is not playing despite there being no official word, because I don't agree with them and believe it is mind games then I am trolling?

I feel you need to go back to the internet dictionary and look up the meaning of the word.

True

Can't be mind games because this didn't come from the club , it came via another player telling one of his family...personally i hope its b011ox and if it is then i will never listen to another rumour ever again

[urlhttps://twitter.com/RLSuperLeague/status/251739201006080001/photo/1/large[/url

bizarre. oloughlin hooker, murphy fullback. im still ridiculously excited, possibly more so now its so unpredictable.

sinfield will bombard jack all night, i pray he's up to the task, can't do any worse than Sam under the high bomb I suppose!

I wouldnt be surprised to see murphy and richards rotate frequently throughout the game

Hats off to 'hareandhounds'...got it spot on last night at 'Posted: 27 Sep 2012 20:30'

Good point , Richards is a superb FB

Personally i would have rather played Richards at FB and Gelling on the wing. It could be a problem if Leeds gets to Murphy early. Big call by Wane either he is a genius or he got this one wrong. But from what i saw of Murphy against the Bullls when we lost he played well and looked secure. But its a major step up for him today.

He got it wrong

A big gamble by Wane that did not pay off especially when he had a great option in Richards

nice little pay day for me

THATS BECAUSE HE DOESN'T HAVE A CLUE HOW TO WIN BIG GAMES

You aren't very observant are you? Which coincides with your season ending. Goodbye.