I think the biggest selling point on this too is that all the away games are going to be shown on it.

I have subscribed to it, and watched the friendly game from the weekend on there, and the pre-season stuff has been very good. All in all, at less than £3 a month, for the year it is a pretty good deal.

Agreed. Hadn't thought about the additional sponsorship on the back of this, great idea.

Paul (Bondi), if you could give IL and SC a nudge in the direction of this thread please.......

I agree. I believe that the Wigan friendly on Sunday will be filmed and shown midweek next week. If Hull KR had a facility to purchase the showing of the game (via limited access to the site) for a one off fee of £3 how many Wiganers would jump on this as well?

As long as there is no price increase to £36.00 a month to cover your royalties

I would happily pay £3, it's not a lot considering a pint in Manchester is of a similar figure.

As if.

Don't think it has any advantages for a club as big as Wigan. It would deter new fans going on to the website, and i can imagine Wigan has a lot more vistors to their site than Hull K.R. We should be pushing interview and clips of Sam to the widest possible market, not restricting it to hardcore fans like ourselves who have nothing better to do than watch every aspect of the club in minute detail.

If it was an on demand service, i'd definitely be on it.

Deffo would consider it.

As I'm now in Cambridge, yes.

100%

TBH - If it included the Academy level games and classic re-runs as well as the weekly rounds (provided that commentary was reinstated to the video - take note Micron), I'd actually be happy to pay around £10 a month for it. So at £35 a year, it would be a steal.

A tenner a month really isn't that much, especially for the enforced out-of-towners to see the matches.

As others have said - If Hull KR can do it, then SURELY we can.

The majority of the official website would remain free of charge to view (other than the TV section). In addition the club could still show highlights of interviews from our high profile first team players in the News Feed as they currently do now. In fact, by editing the player interviews from the TV section then edited 'free to air' footage would probably increase from current levels, thus giving new fans more content and maybe inticing them into paying the £35 if they so wish.

Not sure I'd go as far as a tenner on top of my £92 a month for sky but I'd def pay a fiver a month for it. I work a 5 week shift pattern on days afternoons and nights so I miss quite a few games unless they are on TV.

Who'd have thought it? Hull KR leading the way.... Blimey!!

I certainly would for all the old games.

Would be a great idea,

per year? absolutely

but only if Eddie and Stevo weren't commentating

Although a season ticket holder I do miss more than two away games a year.
The £35 would be that, plus including the U18s & 20s would mean I'd see games and players I never watch.
At £35, yes I'd pay for it.

Its a great idea and I would love us to do it.

Liverpool's version, LFCTV is brilliant, shows classic games, highlights from every game of the season and every reserve and under 18s game.

Get it done Wigan!

I would pay it. Most up to date TV's can get the internet now, so would be no need for linking laptop up.

Mine can.

I am all for it.

Living 250 miles away from Wigan, I only get to see the boys away (including Wembley this year). I miss the Under 20s matches and have to rely on RLfans for comments on the next quota coming along. Of course, my attendance money (other than Wembley) goes straight in the pockets of the away team, rather than Wigan. I decided to cancel my Sky due to the £240 a year to watch a maximum of a dozen Wigan matches a season. Moreover, I was able to watch every match of every round of the NRL last season, but cant get to see my own team. £35 is very cheap price to pay to watch a Wigan dedicated channel, for Live (or recorded matches), under 20s and videos of matches from past seasons I would gladly subscribe and would be willing to dig deeper in my pockets. Dare I say it, but if costs are an issue, a joint venture with those soft footballers would grudgingly be welcome.