I prefer Higham too - in fact we should never have got rid of him.

Myler is where he is because he's a Myler.

bit shocked with that one.

You mean Smith prefers Monaghan. Monaghan is playing 7

Big nose has finally realised how shody Myler really is, he's just another little Gob $h1te with mediocre talent

Yes, but Myler could have been sub as I'm sure Higham might be.

Yea just heard from ssn he's been dropped from the typical northern accent, rugby loving kind of fan.

Salford kept the better of their 2 young halfbacks IMO.

Hes still very young but he hasn't lived up to the hype I'm sure he will bounce back and become a very solid player, hes no Sam Tomkins though

Fortunately for Rugby League, Sam Tomkins, Kyle Eastmond and Ritchie Myler are all very good but different style players.

How strong are Warrington atm that two current England internationals (Bridge and Myler) can't get a run?

He isn't as good as tomkins or eastmond but the lad has scored 20 tries this season in 22 games. Big mistake to drop him in my opinion.

I can't blame smith after what leeds tried do Sam "put him out the game " early which did nt work with Sam but myler prob be different

I agree, he ain't as good as eastmond or tomkins at this moment in time but he is a ball playing 7 and it's hard for a 20yr old lad to come into a team and direct them round the field.

I think as he gets older and settles in to the wolves team he will become a very very good player, he's one of them players that has a knack of being in the right time at the right place.

I think smith has bought him for the long term, not just now.

Didn't Smith do the same with Danny McGuire or Rob Burrow one year?

I think it might have been sinfield.

Got to feel sorry for the lad, if he sticks with Warrington long term this could be his last shot at a final

Could be another one in a couple of months

Quote ="St pete"I think it might have been sinfield.'" news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_l ... 978109.stm Thats the final I was thinking of, not sure if Smith was the coach then or not?

Quote ="St pete"I think it might have been sinfield.'" news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_l ... 978109.stm Thats the final I was thinking of, not sure if Smith was the coach then or not?

Powell was still in charge then. Smith was at Huddersfield I think.

Im pretty sure sinfield was left out of a final.

Against london?

what goes around comes around, myler s--t on salford after hed played for great britain against france under smih he never played for salford again if he did it was the odd match.it was a well known fact hed signed for warrington after having smith whispering in his ear .

Don't you find it a little worrying that none of them, looking like a controlling halfback. Eastmond looks like it to a degree, but isn't what I would call a natural looking type.

Yes but to be fair the eldest of them is still only 21. Apart from Shaun Edwards I cant really remember one doing that job so young in the last 30 years.(and even Edwards had the luxury of having Greg and Hanley with him in his early years)

Hardly world beaters though are they. Bridge is ordinary at best, Myler I'm not convinced of yet.

Bobbie Goulding had that kind of game to dictate play, just not the temperament!