According to the Wire site.
[urlhttp://viewtopic.php?t=411510&start=30[/url


Nothing on the RFL site yet.
[urlhttp://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplinary.php[/url

If you check the reply im sure he says to the referee "You f**kin bent b**tard"

And he wasn't wrong.

Confirmed. www.wiganwarriors.com/news_full.asp?newsid=4803

Confirmed. www.wiganwarriors.com/news_full.asp?newsid=4803

I think we can probably live without him.

O NO!!!!

Does that mean Ben Davies gets ago

Brought to court for speaking an inconvenient truth.

That sounds like the sort of situation the RFL would preside over.

Surely you're joking?

If banned, be good to see how the team plays without him as even though he hasnt played aswel as we all know he can do, he's still a very important part of our team in my opinion.

Fielden was in the wrong. He should have stepped away from the player trying to play the ball. There was no reason to be so close to him.

Apart from bad language, what are they charging him with, standing up at the play of the ball?

Most ridiculous penalty ever.

i am the only one who thinks that before the season is out, he'll be missing a few games for us his "leading with the forearm" technique ??

i know hes been warned in the past, and i noticed last week, that hes started doing it again. its that strange "plant one foot with a huge great stamp, then lunge with the elbow" motion.

Fielden has been called up on two accounts, for a raised knee whilst in possession of the ball – (Grade C) and the use of foul and abusive language – (Grade B).

Edited for accuracy



On a serious note Friday apart i think his form has been ok of late and he will be a koss to the side if banned.

In the amateur leagues thats a 7 game ban atleast

Not good for young kids seeing fielden swearing on tv like that!

They should give him a big ban

Not as bad as kids being able to see Keiron Cunningham's face on TV.

No he shouldn't, he just stood his ground Carvell moved forward into Fielden. The penalty was the wrong way, that's why both he and Noble were so upset, and Warrington scored from the penalty.

I have no objection to him being charged for bad language but the penalty was wrong. He was in front of Carvell and never laid a hand on him or the ball.

We'll miss him if he gets banned. Seriously. He always gives 100% and stays on the pitch for longer than our other props.
He has a big fee and wages hanging around his neck but that's not his fault.

i dont agree.
fielden got up and stood on the correct mark as first marker.......the wire player then tried to move a yard forward to play the ball making it look like fielden was interfering.
penalty to wigan imo for wire player moving off the mark.

but every tackle it seems players move 2 yard forward before playing the ball.
if we wanted to be pedantic we would be seeing penalties at every play the ball.

Nah, I disagree on this one.

Fielden wasn;t even stood up, he was still on one knee, refusing to move backwards away from the tackled player with his hands in the air.

If he wasn;t trying to interfere, why would he have his hands in the air, claiming he wasn;t interfering, and why was he on one knee. I agree that the penalty could have gone the other way, as Carvell made a meal of it, however I think Fielden made it easy for the penalty to go against him. Had he stepped back, he would have had a case for appealing for a penalty. As he didn;t the penalty was always going to go against him. He needs to clear the ruck, and he didn;t.

Penalty was right, as a defending player you know that if you don't get out of the way you're in trouble. He was being a dumb meathead by standing his ground rather than getting out of the way, maybe if he'd moved the penalty would have gone the other way. Then as if he hasn't hampered us enough this season he swears at the ref, get O'Carroll in there!

He had already cleared the rook, but hadn't regained his feet (he was actually on both his knees). Carvell then moved off the mark into him.

I'd agree it was a penalty that could've of gone either way, but I think Fieldens frustration was that it was [ianother[/i penalty that went against Wigan. He had a point too.

Carvell should have played the ball on the spot where he was tackled, not 1 metre forward.

Fielden deliberately kept his hands away from the ball and Carvell. It was never a Warrington penalty hence both Fieldens and Nobles frustration.

And not half so scary as Sean Long's hair!!!