Important you guys defend him again

For what it's worth Micky will be lucky to get away with that but don't come on here preaching about us defending him with all the stuff surrounding Zak Hardaker on your forum.

It was late but nothing that will earn him a ban, on the other hand Paul wood should have been red carded and will get banned

Typical grub act from your esteemed hooker.

As my mum said sticks and stones may break my bones but names will never hurt me

Poor whinos

Paul Wood should get 4 matches for pathetic punching

No but MM might get 1 game for it.

If Hardaker has said anything he is going to miss the rest of the season. So the moral is knock him the heck out but do not call him names it will cost you a lot more. Todays society ehh you can half kill a man and get a game ban if that but call people names and its season ending.

For consistency, and taking into account McIlorum's past record, surely he'll cop a ban? No?

You nailed it.

His record of the last 2 seasons is not as bad as you might think. But i do expect him to get 1 match ban or a letter about his technique.

Technique ,L.O.L

How do you perfect the late challenge , i think his technique on that is well practiced and perfect

Late not shoulder and will possibly get 1 match ban. More of a concern for me is his cannonball tackles, twice at least. He does need to curb that.

His technique looks pretty good from where I'm sitting. The player went off on a stretcher, so from McIlorum's point of view, he achieved his objective.

I hope he get's selected for england. If he wants to tango, let's see him go head to head with those cats from the nrl.

He'll think he's been f*cked by a train.

Agree that Wood should have been sent off but that Micky Mac is one serious scrote. (Not sour grapes, it was another excellent come back).

Great game tonight as a neutral but McIlorum is a disgrace, clobbering somebody from behind. Not being bitter by the way, thought Wood should have gone for his punches as well. As a game it was great to watch.

Well he doesnt have his own thread on the warrington board yet.......

Those calling for Micky's head, for what? It was a challenge that even Cullen describes as a check challenge, not a shoulder charge and in terms of the ball leaving the players hand and impact half a second or the like after the player left Laithwaite's hands?

If there were no injury I doubt very much that anyone would be raising an eyebrow, looking at the Tomkin's penalty which lead to the 2 points for Warrington is essentially the same but nobody is calling for Tomkin's head.

Neither will exposing you as a phoney, I guess. But it won't stop us doing it.

Paul Wood should have been sent off. Simple as that. Pettybourne had 2 choices, either defend himself or get punched in the head. The ref got it wrong and should have only punished Wood.

As for McIlorum, it's nothing knew from him. He is a coward. Typical cheap shot from him. But I won't hold my breath with regards to a ban.

Just this minute see it on the replay.

Not too much in it really. As Cummings says it's more of a chest charge then a shoulder. It's slightly late and he may get a game but that would be harsh (previous may do for him though).

McIlorum a coward? Ha ha. Great player and improving all the time.

I'd agree with that. What Pettybourne was supposed to do there other than defend himself I do not know.



Anyone calling McIlorum a coward doesn't watch him play very much. As to this incident, any other player would get a letter saying watch the technique. We will see what MM gets in due course.

I disagree, I think Pettybourne should have been binned for striking and Wood sent off. According to the laws of the game at least.

A few points need clearing up here,Wood should of got red,you have to sin bin pettybourne thats the rules,now to mcllorum as he goes in to make contact his right arm begins to wrap around laithwaite hence its not a shoulder charge ive had it paused at the point of impact if he gets charged it will be on reputation,as for all the whinos fans there aint no bigger coward/s×ithouse than carl ablett,ryan bailey need i go on with the long list of players at your club.

Technically you are correct. However a ref with a bit of common sense would have been blind to what Pettybourne did as he would have realised he had to do it and had the ref been so, who would have complained?