www.nwemail.co.uk/home/barrow_v_ ... ex=1#video (Edited - Better Link - Bilko).

www.nwemail.co.uk/home/barrow_v_ ... ex=1#video (Edited - Better Link - Bilko).

2:35 into that clip evidence that it is definetly Ainscough who got the 43rd minute try. So he got 4 and Carmont 1. If theres any doubt it is Hansen. Carmont is vertical!

So cherry&white is correct and everyone else is wrong!

I noticed they didn't show our 'no try'.

Karl Pryce's effort to chase back on their long range try

Cracking link, nice one

We have major problems on Thursday unless we show a completely new attitude.

pryce looked worse than ever!

Effort?

The problem for that second try was not Pryce. It was Phil Bailey who missed the tackle.

Could've put more effort to chase back though, don't you think?

Not a problem for thursday, he isnt in the 19.

Yes, but as I said, the problem was caused by Bailey missing the tackle. Pryce is a big lad and is as such is slow to turn as are all big wingers.

Watch the third Barrow try, Pryce makes the tackle in that build up, but is let down by soft defence after.

I bet Mick Potter enjoyed watching them highlights.

Anyone that's paid particular attention to Karl Pryce and not just jumped on the RLFANs bandwagon will soon realise he's a centre, and never a winger in the memory of man.

Not an excuse, just an observation, and something that will go unmentioned from his performance on the weekend.

He played centre in the reserves game v hudds, I was there he had a very good game and got 3 tries.

How is Pryce going to get a go at his preferred position of centre now Gleeson has signed?

He doesnt look quick enough for winger so maybe he should play as a forward?

Or maybe the opposite. He saw Wigan not come out of second gear whereas his team went full steam against Leeds.

The Barrow disallowed try was correct first and foremost.

I thought our tries were well worked. We got the ball out wide which is VERY unusual for us. Defence on the fringes still looks poor though and if we let Saints exploit that then we're in major trouble.

Just read the match report on that website and this little bit made me smile.........

"It got worse when Pryce went in at the other end, twice dropping the ball only feet in front of the same touch judge before he grounded it and the ground bewildered and angry at the decision to grant the four points when a blind man in Ulverston knew it was anything but".

I was stood infront of that and have been saying since that it was Hansen who got the try.

I didn't think it should have stood though for me as he seemed to reef it out(forward) and then plonk his hand on it as it hit the floor.

The video doesn't help. Only they will know. I'm going with Ainscough on the basis that he got up with the ball and Hansen doesn't seem to celebrate.

It's not that he's a terrible player - it's just that he's in the wrong position IMO, he isn't a winger, as we've seen in the games he's played in he has played awfll at wing. He would make a good second row for the likes of Salford, Celtic, Castleford.

No Room For Pryce At Wigan.

Taken the words right out my mouth. Don't care how long people want to give him to get fit or whatever he is a poor excuse for a rugby player IMO. Could make a Prop for Judes or Pats Maybe !

School boy tackling for all there try's.

some of that defence was just awful

massive concerns for tomorrow

I would agree. He has been awful every time that I have seen him play and his defence is dreadful. His attack isnt much better and he gets tackled far too easily for a player of that size. If Noble was picking on form then Pryce shouldnt have even been picked as Goulding has performed him every week in the reserves (barring the game in which he got injured) and should have been selected instead.