|
 |
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Club Coach | 6640 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Feb 2005 | 20 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Feb 2013 | Jan 2013 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="sally cinnamon"So even Sir Clive thinks that Tomkins best position is fullback. What do the "Sam for stand off" brigade think of that? (Or is it "fly-half"icon_wink.gif'"
I think that it is further evidence that Sir Clive is a massive self-publicist and his selection screams 'look at me I'm controversial'.
Sam is a non-starter, Foden's best position is full back (I'm pretty sure he's never played centre) and with just 5 Premiership matches under his belt, Ford is a long way off ready for starting the 6 Nations. |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| International Board Member | 6722 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jun 2003 | 22 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| May 2015 | Mar 2014 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Wigan28/Leeds18 Andy"Quote ="XBrettKennyX"*snip*
You are missing the point WLA.
Bradford and Leeds are both RL clubs and the issue was that of an RL player moving between them.
The key point here is that I have never seen a contract preventing moving jobs between different industries.
I suggest that you at least make sure of your facts before attempting a patronising response. I will, however, try and find the judgement of the Harris investigation though as you suggest.'"
I'm not missing the point. The point was that Harris broke a specific clause in his contract, it matters not that it was between two RL clubs. Harris agreed to something that he then broke, hence why Leeds won, even though the judge agreed it was potentially restraint of trade.
I've very sure of my facts, you obviously aren't given you haven't a clue about the Harris judgement yet are still trying to make a point about it that doesn't exist.'"
Having read the case notes, this bit isn't true, at least this isn't WHY Leeds won the case. |
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Moderator | 14324 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Jan 2025 | Oct 2024 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
Moderator
|
| Quote ="XBrettKennyX"Quote ="Wigan28/Leeds18 Andy"Quote ="XBrettKennyX"*snip*
You are missing the point WLA.
Bradford and Leeds are both RL clubs and the issue was that of an RL player moving between them.
The key point here is that I have never seen a contract preventing moving jobs between different industries.
I suggest that you at least make sure of your facts before attempting a patronising response. I will, however, try and find the judgement of the Harris investigation though as you suggest.'"
I'm not missing the point. The point was that Harris broke a specific clause in his contract, it matters not that it was between two RL clubs. Harris agreed to something that he then broke, hence why Leeds won, even though the judge agreed it was potentially restraint of trade.
I've very sure of my facts, you obviously aren't given you haven't a clue about the Harris judgement yet are still trying to make a point about it that doesn't exist.'"
Having read the case notes, this bit isn't true, at least this isn't WHY Leeds won the case.'"
You'll need to tell the judge to change his verdict. |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 1316 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Aug 2007 | 17 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Sep 2018 | Sep 2017 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
I have seen this thread but never opened it untill today. I have a new found friend (work related) who coaches RU, he has coached at the top level and still is involved in junior level. He often asks my opinion of RL players and we have had a few interesting chats. Only last week he told me he was in London for a meeting and he was talking to the coaching staff and directors at London Harlequins. They are still after Sam and do have a package together which is supported by sponsors money. If would make him the highest payed player in both codes in this country. I just laughed it off at the time stating he had just signed a new 3 three year contract with a "no communication with RU" his reply, does that stop them from going to him and giving him the offer? Suppose not. Will he go? i dont think so. Its just going to be a story that will never go away.
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| International Board Member | 6722 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jun 2003 | 22 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| May 2015 | Mar 2014 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Wigan28/Leeds18 Andy"Quote ="XBrettKennyX"Quote ="Wigan28/Leeds18 Andy"Quote ="XBrettKennyX"*snip*
You are missing the point WLA.
Bradford and Leeds are both RL clubs and the issue was that of an RL player moving between them.
The key point here is that I have never seen a contract preventing moving jobs between different industries.
I suggest that you at least make sure of your facts before attempting a patronising response. I will, however, try and find the judgement of the Harris investigation though as you suggest.'"
I'm not missing the point. The point was that Harris broke a specific clause in his contract, it matters not that it was between two RL clubs. Harris agreed to something that he then broke, hence why Leeds won, even though the judge agreed it was potentially restraint of trade.
I've very sure of my facts, you obviously aren't given you haven't a clue about the Harris judgement yet are still trying to make a point about it that doesn't exist.'"
Having read the case notes, this bit isn't true, at least this isn't WHY Leeds won the case.'"
You'll need to tell the judge to change his verdict.'"
No I don't. You need to read into the REASON for the verdict. |
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Moderator | 14324 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Jan 2025 | Oct 2024 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
Moderator
|
| Quote ="XBrettKennyX"No I don't. You need to read into the REASON for the verdict.'"
I have done, thankfully without the need to spin it into an agenda I desperately need to keep going (for some reason). |
|
|
|
|
|
