On the contrary, I feel that Leeds' win means that there is proof that a side outside the top 2 can win the "comp".

They grey area for me is what is seen as the "comp" by the powers that be. Is it the 27 weeks of fixtures, or the 4 weeks at the end with the playoffs? At the moment, there is too much neglect on the regular season.

The team who finishes top should be celebrated as much as the GF winners do now in my opinion. If Rovers ever finished first I can safely say I would be disappointed if they received a similar trophy presentation to that of Warrington's this year.

The league should be structured that they play 27 weeks, with the winner crowned Super League champions 20xx, wait 2 weeks and then have the 20xx Super League Playoff Series, 1v8, 2v7, 3v6, 4v5 and then have a simple bracket resulting in the Final at Old Trafford to crown the Playoff champion. Similar to the old Premiership trophy.

C'mon guys!! We're better than this!

Personal insults? Do you know the meaning of the word hypocrite?

Stop running stop hiding......and now reverting to type.

You have a great opportunity to get some credibility here.

I ask again.

Does the fact that Madge won the title over a coach who had won it 3 years in a row so obviously knew how to win it mean anything?

Did Madge "nearly fail" in 2010? If so how?

Did the Gleeson situation have any influence on our season?

Did our lack of senior Props throughout the year influence our ability to peak?

Would you prefer the Leeds coaches over Madge and his team in the last 2 years?

Does madge understand how to win the comp? Beating a coach who had won it 3 years on the bounce?

Would you like Noble back at the club? (a coach who cannot get a job)

Stop with the personal insults and lets discuss this on a forum. Man up time.

Lenegan OUT


FIOS

Seeing it was the result between our sides the last time we met, I'd say it was pretty apt still.



Well done to your team tonight.

Obviously some are not.