Seriously,would you consider him for the job?

What, because you found an off-the-cuff remark about a different situation that happens to suit you? Don't think so pal, you've just proved how cringingly sad and desperate you are by going to those lengths.





Then it's a good shot. I still wouldn't call it a tackle. Not sure what you don't understand about this? But then it's becoming increasingly clear you don't understand the technicalities or nuances of RL.


Yet you dedicate so much time battling anyone who says a word against him, don't you?



Enough now, this is dull and you're boring. We all saw what happened and we all know what Bailey's about.

of spending 40 seconds looking for something? If thats how you want to backtrack thats how you want to backtrack. You will still look like a one-eyed Wigan hypocrite




you think it is a technicality or a nuance of the game to pretend that a tackle with the shoulder is called a shot and a tackle with the arms is called a tackle. You have much to learn young man.

I havent defended him once. We all saw that and we all know what you are about.

Whatever you say lad - enough fannying around while you attempt to form some strange and random argument on the back of tenuous quotes and petty distraction tactics - let's get back to the issue:

Bailey - proper sh*thouse, ain't he?

No, not really. But he manages to wind up idiots and no-nothings into a fantastic palaver.