Quote ="Jimmy Birts Lives On"I always thought Maguire was here on a 2 year contract anyway. I only discovered when news broke over his departure that he was on a 3 year deal. I hoped when we got him that within his 2 years he'd get the club back challenging for honours and seeing as we won the league in his first year I'd say job done. Maybe a get out clause in the contract was put there in Wigan's interest too should it have turned out that he was bobbins.'"
Have to disagree stongly with this. You would not run any business on the basis you describe.
The job isnt done - we're 1 and a bit years into a 3 year programme - one successful season is not what we appointed him for.
The 'get out of jail clause' renders the contract useless - if as you say it was in wigans interest too then why have a contract at all? Think about it, if either party can call it quits at any point in time - whats the use of a contract? Dont forget Madge has been out recruiting his co-horts from Melbourne 'building a team' - its like laying the foundations of the house and buggering off without laying a brick.
IL is a shrewd business man - I cannot believe he has entered into an agreement such as the one being discussed on here.