|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 144 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2013 | Nov 2012 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
www.superleague.co.uk/article.php?id=21609
Quote Halifax, who also meet the minimum criteria for membership of the sport’s premier competition, will now go forward to be assessed alongside the existing 14 Engage Super League clubs at the next stage of the licensing process which concludes in July.'"
Maybe a 16 team league?
It would make sense really, top 8, bottem 8 mini comps at end of season!
|
|
www.superleague.co.uk/article.php?id=21609
Quote Halifax, who also meet the minimum criteria for membership of the sport’s premier competition, will now go forward to be assessed alongside the existing 14 Engage Super League clubs at the next stage of the licensing process which concludes in July.'"
Maybe a 16 team league?
It would make sense really, top 8, bottem 8 mini comps at end of season!
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 190 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2009 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2016 | May 2015 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| what if it was 16 team league split into a top and bottom 8 teams where everyone plays each each other twice with MM matches contained within the tiers therefore playing a competing 3 times . top 8 go into plays for the GF and the lower 8 go into a play off to get into the top 8?
not sure how the team to be demoted to the lower 8 would work if there was a play off system, what if the 8th placed club had a really good run in the play offs?
GF at OT and the lower final at bolton, blackburn or leeds.
obviously this could reduce GF sales but the league could do a deal, by one get one half price kind of thing
not sure if it would work but it could be an idea.
you heard it here first
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 2797 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2008 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2017 | Oct 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="gazmeister_89"what if it was 16 team league split into a top and bottom 8 teams where everyone plays each each other twice with MM matches contained within the tiers therefore playing a competing 3 times . top 8 go into plays for the GF and the lower 8 go into a play off to get into the top 8?
not sure how the team to be demoted to the lower 8 would work if there was a play off system, what if the 8th placed club had a really good run in the play offs?
GF at OT and the lower final at bolton, blackburn or leeds.
obviously this could reduce GF sales but the league could do a deal, by one get one half price kind of thing
not sure if it would work but it could be an idea.
you heard it here first
'"
Wouldnt work in a million years. Fans from the lower half of the draw would get sick of only playing the other teams in the bottom half and never getting to travel to places like Wigan, Warrington, Leeds etc. Which is why all of the lower sides want to be in the top flight, to compete against the better sides. Look at all those Widnes fans immediately after their license announcement yesterday, one of the 1st things they mentioned was they couldnt wait to be mixing it with the big teams again. Huge disappointment if all they got was 3 games a year against Salford, Cas, Crusaders etc.
The bit in bold, I like how you have come up with a system and then are questioning yourself how it would work
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 190 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2009 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2016 | May 2015 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="WARRIORCRAIG"Wouldnt work in a million years. Fans from the lower half of the draw would get sick of only playing the other teams in the bottom half and never getting to travel to places like Wigan, Warrington, Leeds etc. Which is why all of the lower sides want to be in the top flight, to compete against the better sides. Look at all those Widnes fans immediately after their license announcement yesterday, one of the 1st things they mentioned was they couldnt wait to be mixing it with the big teams again. Huge disappointment if all they got was 3 games a year against Salford, Cas, Crusaders etc.
The bit in bold, I like how you have come up with a system and then are questioning yourself how it would work
'"
each team would play every team in the whole system twice. resulting in 31 games a year
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 28736 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2016 | Mar 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Pieman"doesnt count anymore, otherwise quins and crusaders would be in trouble. They changed the ruling after the Quins thing. Wakey might have gone under but were allowed to spend 1.65 million. I bet Wakeys turnover is more than Widnes's. which would give them a point. Better academy and have bigger crowds than Widnes.'"
I tell you what, this post is an absolute farce. Stick Wakefield in the championship for 3 years plus and we will see about those bigger crowds and academy, because I recall our academy teams were beating all the super league teams last season and our crowds were 500+ greater per game than anyone elses in the division. It's not actually that easy to get the crowds in in the championship, so the chances of us beating an established SL team are effectively zero. Our away fan contingent is usually roughly 50 people, and fans are not as attracted to games against Batley as they would be Wigan.
It's about potential, being in the wrong place at the wrong time and being consigned to the championship should not be a death sentence. We've earned our place at the top table and Wakefield will have no one to blame but themselves.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 5443 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2018 | Aug 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Chris Dalton"I tell you what, this post is an absolute farce. Stick Wakefield in the championship for 3 years plus and we will see about those bigger crowds and academy, because I recall our academy teams were beating all the super league teams last season and our crowds were 500+ greater per game than anyone elses in the division. It's not actually that easy to get the crowds in in the championship, so the chances of us beating an established SL team are effectively zero. Our away fan contingent is usually roughly 50 people, and fans are not as attracted to games against Batley as they would be Wigan.
It's about potential, being in the wrong place at the wrong time and being consigned to the championship should not be a death sentence. We've earned our place at the top table and Wakefield will have no one to blame but themselves.'"
I think you'll find of us, myself included, agreeing with that - it's only one or two people agreeing with the OP.
|
|
|
|
|